The Economist's editorial stance is based on classical liberalism. The newspaper sees itself as a proponent of a liberalism inspired by Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, John Locke, David Hume and William Ewart Gladstone, and opposes any unjustified restriction of individual liberties, whether economic or personal. Since its inception, the newspaper has supported radical centrism and favored centrist politics. The Economist advocates economic liberalism, particularly free markets, free trade, free immigration, deregulation, and globalization.
The Economist supports socially liberal causes, such as recognition of same-sex marriage. In addition, the U.S. tax system has been criticized as unfair, and the newspaper argues for government regulation such as a ban on smoking in public places, or a worldwide ban on corporal punishment for children, as well as strict laws on gun ownership. The Economist consistently advocates government migration aid and free school choice by parents through education vouchers. The newspaper also once published an obituary for God. The Economist has advocated for drug legalization since 1989, calling legalization the "least bad solution." A February 2016 article praised global progress towards cannabis legalization.
The Economist supports action against climate change. Climate change is to be combated by efficient and effective instruments such as a CO2 price and emissions trading. In 1997, the newspaper wrote that the United States was showing "dangerous signs" of using the developing world as an excuse to do nothing about global warming. In 1998, The Economist argued that global warming was a disaster that required big money to reduce fossil fuels. In an editorial before the UN climate conference in Copenhagen in 2009, The Economist said that the risk of catastrophic climate change and its impact on the economy far outweigh the economic costs of tackling climate change. The newspaper supports the Paris Agreement and advocates a tightening of global climate targets.
The Economist supported Britain's accession to the EuropeanEconomic Community and membership of the European Union. It particularly emphasizes the great economic benefits of the common internal market. However, the EU bureaucracy is criticized for its inefficiency. In the 2016 UK EU membership referendum, The Economist came out in favour of the Remain campaign. The newspaper opposes a no-deal Brexit and calls for a second referendum.
The paper argues for subsidy reduction and opposes price controls. It also advocates global free trade agreements. However, governments should help workers who lose their jobs as a result of the resulting efficiency gains in the economy.
The Economist has repeatedly come out in favour of the CDU and Angela Merkel in the federal election. However, it is critical of coalitions with the SPD and favours coalitions with the FDP and the Greens instead. In the UK House of Commons elections, The Economist has supported the Labour Party (2005), the Conservative Party (2010 and 2015), and the Liberal Democrats (2017 and 2019). In the United States presidential election, the newspaper has supported both Republican and Democratic candidates. It came out in favour of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden.
The Ecomonist endorses the economic reforms of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. The newspaper argues that Thatcher's transformation of the British economy towards free markets, privatisation and deregulation was very positive and backs this up with macroeconomic figures.
In 2008, The Economist noted that Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, then president of Argentina, was destroying any hope for change and leading her country into economic peril and social conflict. The Economist called for the impeachment of Bill Clinton. After the Abu Ghuraib torture scandal came to light, the newspaper called for the resignation of Donald Rumsfeld. The Economist supported the Iraq war but was unhappy about its strategic execution.
In a 175th anniversary editorial, The Economist criticized supporters of liberalism for protecting the political status quo rather than implementing reform. The newspaper urged liberals to recommit to bold political, economic, and social reforms: Protection of free markets, land and tax reforms in the Georgist tradition, open immigration, rethinking the social contract with greater emphasis on education, and a revival of liberal internationalism.