The most common use of the term is in a social science context. Here, stereotypes are based on delimitation and the formation of categories around groups of people to whom complexes of characteristics or behaviours are attributed. This clearly distinguishes them from schemata that do not primarily contain social information (e.g.
prototypes). Stereotypes (in contrast to sociotypes) are also characterised by the fact that they often
caricature and sometimes falsely generalise particularly distinct and obvious characteristics. Such a simplified representation of other groups of people greatly facilitates everyday interactions with unknown persons. Stereotypes triggered by external characteristics (e.g. age, clothing, appearance, gender) serve as reference structures for expected and anticipated behaviour (→
self-fulfilling prophecy). However, the simplification thus ensured also has disadvantages and can in part manifest social inequalities. As soon as characteristics such as gender or skin colour are associated with negative evaluations that clearly limit the interaction possibilities of people in many areas of life, we speak of prejudices.
In psychology, behaviors or movements are referred to as stereotypes, which are repeated frequently and usually seemingly meaninglessly, regardless of the specific environmental situation.
In contrast to this are prejudices - on the one hand as abstract-general prejudices, on the other hand as attitudes towards individuals. Stereotypes, on the other hand, do not per se contain a (negative or positive) evaluation; they reduce complexity and also offer possibilities for identification.
Inspired by postcolonialist studies, psychology and other social sciences are now discussing the extent to which scientific concepts can also contribute to problematic stereotyping and prejudice due to their complexity-reducing function. Examples of this can be found in comparative cultural studies, in which, for example, a blanket distinction is made between so-called "individualistic" and so-called "collectivistic" cultures, and these are marked and differentiated on the basis of further supposed "national characteristics" or "cultural features". Corresponding distinctions can also arise in science from socio-historically grown and often insufficiently reflected ethnocentric views.
Social science use
In psychology, behaviors or movements are referred to as stereotypes, which are repeated frequently and usually seemingly meaninglessly, regardless of the specific environmental situation.
In contrast to this are prejudices - on the one hand as abstract-general prejudices, on the other hand as attitudes towards individuals. Stereotypes, on the other hand, do not per se contain a (negative or positive) evaluation; they reduce complexity and also offer possibilities for identification.
Inspired by postcolonialist studies, psychology and other social sciences are now discussing the extent to which scientific concepts can also contribute to problematic stereotyping and prejudice due to their complexity-reducing function. Examples of this can be found in comparative cultural studies, in which, for example, a blanket distinction is made between so-called "individualistic" and so-called "collectivistic" cultures, and these are marked and differentiated on the basis of further supposed "national characteristics" or "cultural features". Corresponding distinctions can also arise in science from socio-historically grown and often insufficiently reflected ethnocentric views.