Skeptical Inquirer — magazine of science, reason, and critical inquiry

Focus and typical content

The journalistic focus is on separating reliable science from unsupported or misleading assertions. It is not a peer-reviewed scientific journal but rather a science-oriented magazine that emphasizes critical thinking. Typical topics include:

• Scientific advances and how they are interpreted for the public.
• Investigations of pseudoscience, ranging from dubious medical claims to paranormal stories.
• Analysis of extraordinary claims, media coverage of science, and education about the scientific method.

History and development

The Skeptical Inquirer grew out of the organized skeptical movement of the late 20th century and has served as a central forum for skeptics, scientists, and science writers to document and critique questionable claims. It is produced under the auspices of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, whose mission emphasizes scientific inquiry, critical investigation, and the use of reason. Over time the magazine has expanded from brief reports to longer feature articles and investigative pieces.

Role and influence

As a popular publication, the magazine aims to inform educators, journalists, policy makers, and interested members of the public. It publishes case studies, reviews of books and media, interviews with researchers, and rebuttals to widely circulated falsehoods. Contributors include scientists, professional skeptics, journalists, and educators who write for nontechnical readers while retaining methodological rigor. The work supports better public understanding of science and encourages skepticism grounded in evidence and logic; see resources on reason and inquiry.

Distinctive features

Notable features of the magazine include a commitment to evidence-based critique, a mix of reporting and opinion, and a focus on education rather than academic publication. It documents recurring patterns in how pseudoscientific claims spread and provides practical guidance for assessing extraordinary claims. While its writers often come from scientific backgrounds, its editorial approach is intended for a broad audience and seeks to foster critical thinking skills rather than to replace primary scientific literature.