The classical Siberian shamanism or animism
"The [Siberian] shamanism is not only an archaic ecstasy technique, not only an early stage of development of religion, and not only a psychomental phenomenon, but a complex religious system. This system includes the faith that worships the auxiliary spirits of the shamans and the knowledge that guards the sacred texts (shamanic chants, prayers, hymns and legends). It includes the rules that guide the shaman in the acquisition of the ecstasy technique, and it requires knowledge of the objects needed in the séance for healing or divination. Generally, all of these elements occur together."
The research of shaman traditions began with the small Siberian peoples and at the beginning of the 21st century it often comes back to it: Many authors use the term shamanism exclusively for the Siberian cultural area, but without naming it concretely; and although shamanism and religion are mostly no longer put into a primary context, the classical Siberian form (often only undifferentiatedly called shamanism) is not seldom used as a synonym for the animistic religions of Siberia and Central Asia because of its extensive research history
Decisive for the classical shamanism of Siberia is the homologous (originating from one root) emergence of its varieties through the historical cultural transfer from one ethnic group to the next or - according to Michael Witzel - through migratory movements of the ancient Asian peoples and their expansion across the Bering Strait. He points out that the distribution area of one of Y. E. Berezkin (2005), described by Witzel as "Laurasian" and dated to the Late Paleolithic, largely coincides with the distribution area of shamanism as well as with the distribution of the hypothetical Na-Dene language family and the C3 haplogroup of the Y chromosome.
Historical development
The presentation of the similarities between the beliefs, rites, cults and mythologies is hardly understandable without knowing the historical background of the peoples living there. Siberia was first settled about 20,000 to 25,000 years ago in the Upper Paleolithic until the Neolithic, when most of the entire area was inhabited. The first archaeologically verifiable cult sites were established a few thousand years ago. They already show a pronounced cultural differentiation of the peoples there.
In the steppes and forest steppes of southern Siberia lived peasant and pastoral peoples, while in the taiga adjoining to the north, hunting, fishing and gathering were the normal subsistence strategies. Especially the peoples in Yakutia and in the Baikal region had close relations to each other; archaeological artifacts such as rock paintings bear witness to this, allowing certain conclusions to be drawn about their religious beliefs. In the tundra and forest tundra of the far north lived predominantly small and relatively isolated peoples who either lived from sedentary fishing or hunting marine mammals or were semi-nomadic reindeer herders.
Until the 16th and 17th centuries, the peoples of Siberia still lived apart from European influences. For centuries, however, their beliefs were influenced by various religions from the Near East, Central Asia and East Asia. These included Zoroastrianism, Manichaeism and Christianity, and above all the influence of Buddhism. The proto-Mongol peoples had already come into contact with it from the 2nd century B.C. onwards. Mongolian tribes then brought Mahayana Buddhism to Central Asia as far as the Amur region between the 8th and 12th centuries. In the early 15th century, the Gelug school of classical Indian Buddhism was founded in Tibet and spread to Buryatia, Kalmykia and Tuva by the 17th century. By the end of the 19th century, Buddhism was established among the Trans-Baikal Buryats and influenced the daily life, culture, and outlook on life of many Siberian and Central Asian peoples. This led to a syncretic mixing of shamanic and Buddhist ideas. An example is the shaman mirror toli among the Buryats, which originally came from China, and the appearance of persons who were both lama and shaman.
Cosmology
→ Main article: Shamanic cosmology
Part of the classical shamanic cosmology was the afterlife concept of a multi-layered cosmos consisting of three (sometimes more) levels: Benevolent and malevolent spirits exist in the upper and lower worlds, and a world axis (axis mundi) connects the three levels in the center. Depending on the culture, this axis is symbolized by the world tree, the smoke hole in the yurt, a sacred mountain or the shaman drum. The soul was considered an entity independent of the body, which can travel on this axis to the spirit world with the help of animal spirits.
The ritual ecstasy
The so-called "ritual ecstasy" was and is an essential element of classical shamanism, but also of all religious-spiritual shamanism concepts, some of which go far beyond Siberia. Depending on the illness of a patient, the wish of a group member or the mission of the community, the shaman went on a "soul journey into the world of the spirits" to make contact with them or to positively influence their work in the sense of the problem to be solved. As a rule, the natural balance between the worlds was considered disturbed in some way and it should be rebalanced in this way.
Such a spirit conjuration (séance) was a highly ritualized affair that required various measures and had to take place at the right time in the right place (→ Kamlanie, the séance of the Siberian shamans in the article "Séance").
The actual ecstasy is experienced, depending on the cultural imprint, either as the emergence of one's own soul or as possession by a spirit.
Hinaustreten (also passive or trophotropic ecstasy) - the classic and by far the most common type of ecstasy in Siberia - is described as a magical flight into another spaceless and timeless world, in which man and cosmos form a unity, so that answers and insights reveal themselves that would remain unattainable by normal means. Experiencing this inner dimension is distinctly real and highly conscious for the shaman.
In the imagination of traditional people, the experience of an afterlife journey corresponded to the dreams of ordinary people, but consciously induced and controlled; similar to a lucid dream. In the process, the shaman's vital functions sink to an abnormal minimum: shallow breathing, slow heartbeat, lower body temperature, rigid limbs and clouded senses characterize this state.
In complete contrast to this is the ritual ecstasy of (learned) possession (active or ergotropic ecstasy), which occurs in Siberia only among a few ethnic groups in the transitional areas to the high religions of Islam and Buddhism. In South and Southeast Asia or in Africa, on the other hand, such states of possession are the norm. The shaman has the feeling that a being from the Otherworld would enter him and take possession of his body for the duration of the ritual in order to solve the set task. This causes a strong increase in bodily functions: He gets into turmoil, raves, foams, fidgets or "floats", talks in incomprehensible languages and shows enormous strength.
In both forms of ritual ecstasy, altered perceptions occur, which can affect all sensory impressions (sight, hearing, touch, smell, taste, bodily sensation). In addition, the emotions, the experience of meaning and the sense of time are modified. The intensity of these impressions is much stronger, more unpredictable, and beyond the person's accumulated experience than, for example, in fantasy journeys that can be produced while awake.
From a neuropsychological point of view, in both cases a certain form of an extended state of consciousness is present, which is called "ecstatic trance". In all forms of deep trance, there is simultaneously a very deep relaxation as in deep sleep, the highest concentration as in awake consciousness, and a particularly impressive pictorial experience as in a dream. The special way in which the shamans of Siberia (but also of Central Asia, of northern North America, partly of East and Southeast Asia and of some peoples of the rest of America) induce the trance, as well as the cultural imprint and the corresponding religious orientation, leads in the shamanic trance through the neurological "hyper-state of rest" to passive or through "hyper-excitement" to active ecstasy.
The shaman always experiences this extraordinary mental state as a real event that seems to take place outside his mind. Sometimes he sees himself from the outside (out-of-body experience), similar to what is reported in near-death experiences. As is known today, man in this state has direct access to the unconscious: the hallucinated spirit beings arise from the instinctive archetypes of the human psyche; the ability to grasp connections intuitively - that is, without rational thought - is fully developed and often manifests itself in visions that are later interpreted against one's own religious background.
To achieve such states, certain formulas, ritual actions and mental techniques are used: These are, for example, burning incense, certain monotonous rhythms on special ceremonial drums or with rattles, dance (trance dance), chanting or special breathing techniques. The Siberian shamans usually do not need psychedelic drugs to achieve ecstasy as many other peoples do. Only the Uralic peoples sometimes use toadstools (for some authors, it is precisely the ability to trance without drugs that is a hallmark of classical shamanism).
Particularly important for achieving a non-drug-induced trance is the adoption of ritual postures (according to Felicitas Goodman) in conjunction with steady percussion rhythms in the range of 3.5 to 4.4 hertz (equals about 210 to 230 drum beats per minute). These frequencies correspond to the theta and delta brain waves that are otherwise typical of sleep or meditation. During trance, so-called "paradoxical arousal" states occur. Paradoxical because, on the one hand, they indicate a state that can be described as "more awake than awake" and, at the same time, show EEG curves that are otherwise known only from deep sleep stages. Subjects reported particularly impressive hallucinations during these trance phases. Furthermore, significant beta and delta increases are measured, which characterize a very deep relaxation and promote, among other things, physical healing reactions and memory processes. The paradoxical states of arousal discovered by Giselher Guttmann in 1990 thus indicate a "relaxed high tension". In general, the release of a special combination of different endogenous neurotransmitters is stimulated, which "open up" consciousness: perception is directed entirely toward inner content (intersensory coordination), the cognitive filters of the normal waking state are inactive, while the observing ego remains active.
Basically, all ritual trances produce either particularly passive or particularly active physiological effects, which then express themselves in the shamans in the two aforementioned forms of ecstasy. However, the more intense the respective ecstasy is, the less the intentionally induced hallucinations can be controlled.
The measurement of brain waves and the like. methods can only prove that consciousness is active in a certain way. However, no conclusions can be drawn about the concrete contents of the respective states of arousal. Therefore, it is in principle impossible to prove or disprove that the impressions in ritual ecstasy are imaginations or actual glimpses of an otherworldly world. This remains a matter of faith.
Müller: Elemental, complex and possession shamanism
For concrete description of the present situation and references see: Modern Shamans in the Light of History in the article "Shaman".
"Apart from all secondary additions, shamanism represents at its core a visibly very old and optimally adapted to the conditions of existence of savage and field-herding cultures, that is, apparently `proven' and insofar stable over long periods of time, as coherent as it is coherent, as it were `unified' theory of being and nature."
In 1997, the German ethnologist Klaus E. Müller presented an approach that describes shamanism as a kind of "science of magical-mythical thinking" that was developed, transmitted and preserved by "appointed experts" with important social obligations. Müller recognizes the similarities regarding religious views or ritual trance techniques, but explicitly distances himself from considering such "spiritualistic and occultistic aspects" as defining characteristics.
Müller continues Adolf E. Jensen's thoughts, who saw shamanism as a typical phenomenon for hunter cultures, which in principle regarded animals as their relatives. Clear indications of this assumption are the manifold totemic animal references: The calling of the shamans took place through the "animal mother" in the spirit world or the "lord of the animals", the auxiliary spirits were predominantly animal-shaped, the shaman - often dressed with animal attributes - often transformed into a spirit animal on the journey, the magic drum or mallet was taken as a symbolic mount for the journey and some more.
According to Müller, the original form of shamanism is primarily a ritual for forgiveness and averting punishment and disaster when a hunter disregarded the traditional appeasement and binding rituals for killing an animal. This played a central role in everyday life for all hunter peoples and ultimately served to safeguard animal and plant populations.
According to him, shamanism originated somewhere in Asia in the Upper Paleolithic period clearly before 4000 B.C. and spread from there in many centuries among the "soulmate" hunter peoples over the entire Asian continent and beyond to North, Central and South America as well as to Australia. Based on the description of the shaman as "expert and mediator to the spirit world" and the resulting social obligations, a corresponding distribution map of shamanism can be drawn.
In Müller's view, the "classical" area includes not only Siberia, but also present-day Kazakhstan and scattered local communities in Southeast Asia, including the Indonesian archipelago. Sometimes he also mentions the shamanism of the Eskimo peoples of North America in this context. However, it is not clear whether he actually includes them in classical shamanism or not. According to Müller, the shamanism forms of the Aborigines and the Indian peoples have split off early from the classical elementary forms and have further developed isolated. In contrast, Witzel considers Siberian shamanism to be a relatively "young" split-off (at least 20,000 years old) from a more widespread paleo-shamanism.
Müller considers it likely that the original ("elemental") shamanism of hunter-gatherers in the subpolar regions of Asia and North America has survived largely unchanged into modern times because the environmental and living conditions there have remained virtually the same. Moreover, he notes that to this day it is found primarily among ethnic groups that have a close relationship with the animal kingdom (wild-herder and pastoralist cultures, as well as the garden and shifting-field farmers of Amazonia, whose way of life has a strong "hunter-gatherer" component). In pure planter cultures or among agropastoralists, shamanism has always played only a marginal role.
Klaus E. Müller therefore derives his forms of shamanism primarily from their socio-economic bases and from this he developed a three-part classification model (the following descriptions of which are written in the past tense, since today they apply only selectively to a few isolated peoples):
Elemental Shamanism
Color scheme:
Elemental (primary) shamanism was typical of pure hunter cultures or of ethnic groups in which hunting played a prominent cultural role.
The social basis is based on egalitarian local communities or kinship groups (lineages, clans). The ethnic religions were usually animistic. The shaman was predominantly male. Believed to be called by animal spirits, he was primarily responsible for hunting success or adherence to "hunting ethics," but also acted as a healer and monitored the reproductive success of the group. The ritual was not very pronounced and costumes or special aids hardly occurred or only sporadically and in a simple form.
1. classical asian cultural area
· Unique shape:
Original nomadic to sedentary hunter-fisher-gatherers of northern and eastern Siberia; since Russification, often reindeer herders like the other Siberian peoples. Variants from the historical differentiation:
Paleo-Siberian (primary) savage tribesmen (Chukchi, Yukagirs, Koryaks, Itelmen)
Siberian (secondary) wild boars (Nganasans, Dolganes, Keten)
In northeastern India among a few groups (attenuated) especially in the central area (e.g., Birhor), scattered hunter-gatherers of Southeast Asia (Derung, Yao, Akha, Mani, Orang Asli peoples, Sentinelese, Shompen, Mentawai, Kubu, Penan, Batak, Aeta).
2. America and Australia
· Unique (classic?) form:
Nomadic to sedentary hunter-gatherers of the Arctic of North America (Eskimos and Aleuts)
· Unique shape:
Nomadic to semi-settled hunter-gatherers of the subarctic (Athabascans, Algonkin) and settled fishermen of the northwest coast
· Restricted form:
Nomadic to sedentary hunter-gatherers (partly field farmers) of the "Wild West" (Plains Indians and Indians of the Plateau, Great Basin and California cultural areas)
Nomadic hunters & gatherers of South America of the South American cultural areas Llanos, Paraná and Tierra del Fuego
· Variable shape, not continuous:
Nomadic hunter-gatherers of the Aborigines, not continuous (especially in the Western Desert as well as in Northern Australia)
Complex Shamanism
Color scheme:
The secondary complex shamanism has arisen among pastoral peoples and field farmers with a significant share of wild beasts in Asia as well as in America presumably by manifold influences of neighboring agrarian societies and by contacts with other religions - according to Witzel by substitution of the animal deities by plant and vegetation gods (e.g. corn gods like Cinteotl.).
The social basis is formed by kinship associations, tribal societies or autonomous village communities. The animistic religions were more complex (for example, with ancestor worship, sacrificial beings, and a complicated cosmology). The calling of shamans was attributed to ancestral spirits or the dead souls of former shamans (the latter especially among Tungus and groups in the Altai Mountains), or shaman status was inherited from father to son or mother to daughter. There were predominantly male shamans, although female shamans also appeared more frequently. The functions and techniques of the shamans corresponded on the one hand to elemental shamanism, but in addition there were also priestly, communal and domestic-family functions (for example at births, naming, burials, initiations). Rites, costumes with extensive accessories (such as metal) and utensils were often complex and of great importance. Entheogenic drugs were also frequently used to achieve the trance.
1. classical asian cultural area
· Pastoral nomads. Variants from the historical differentiation:
Western Siberian reindeer herders (e.g. Sámi, Nenets, Khanty, Mansi)
Central Siberian Reindeer Herders (Tungusic Peoples)
Altai reindeer and horse breeders (e.g. Kazakhs, Tuvins, Yakuts)
Manchurian fishermen (e.g. Tungusic peoples of Manchuria, Niwchen, Ainu)
· Tropical/subtropical plant communities, not continuous, sporadic.
Local minorities of Hind India (e.g. Naga, Aimol, Moken, Jakun, Senoi) and Indonesia (e.g. Dusun, Halmahera)
2. america
· Differentiated forms, partly not continuous:
North America's Northeast, (e.g., Shawnee, Iroquois, Sauk, Powhatan).
Mexico (e.g. Tarahumara, Huichol)
Meso- and South America (all plant communities outside the high Andes).
Possession Shamanism
Color scheme:
High-culture syncretic possession shamanism can be traced back to influences of archaic high cultures, Asian high religions (especially Buddhism) and to the fusion with possession cults.
The usual social base was the peasant village community. The religious orientation consisted of an official direction - such as Islam, Lamaism, Vajrayana Buddhism, Hinduism, Shintoism, etc. - and a syncretic folk faith that fused elements of the high religions and the old traditional beliefs. Women who felt called to do so were more often shamans here than men. They felt bound for life to a spirit power or deity to whom sacrifices and homage were regularly paid in small temples set up for the purpose. The shaman's duties were the same as those of complex shamanism and were primarily directed toward medical services as well as counseling and divination. In contrast to the other forms of shamanism, there was no "journey to the other world" by means of a ritual ecstasy, but the shaman had the impression during the trance that her personal partner spirit would take possession of her; "drive into" her and heal, prophesy, etc. with the greatest of ease. In contrast to other - according to Müller non-shamanistic - possession cults of other cultures (for example of Africa or New Guinea) the entering of the spirit took place on invitation of the shaman and not "abruptly" or against the will of the person concerned.
In the Islamic contact area today, the influence of the old religions is much less noticeable than in the Buddhist contact area.
· Asian culture area
Especially in sedentary peasant village societies
Islamic sphere of influence (e.g., Uzbeks, Tajiks, Kyrgyz, Uyghurs)
Lamaist sphere of influence (e.g. Buryats, Mongols, Yugur, Tibetans, Changpa, partly Nepalese)
Buddhist-Daoist sphere of influence (e.g., majority populations of Japan, Korea, Taiwan, rear India).
Criticism
Although Müller includes various cultural aspects in his way of looking at things and his "three-type model" certainly makes differentiations, his "standardization" also sometimes leads to questionable results due to the global scale. For example, René Tecklenburg states that the shamanism of the Lakota Indians cannot simply be assigned to elemental shamanism, since it also shows clear characteristics of the peasant type (close connection to the guardian spirit, numerous cult objects, complex ceremonies and rituals, sacrifices, etc.).
Holistic medicine
Modern theses often focus reductionistically on a certain sub-area of shamanism: for example on the psychological or neurobiological aspects or on healing, but the cultural background is left out.
Often shamanism is understood today only as a special form of traditional healing methods. Ronald Hitzler, Peter Gross and Anne Honer, for example, describe it as "a complex, integrative social art that embeds the competence to heal, in the medical sense, in the concern for and service to the existential 'healing' of fellow human beings in general." They thus attest to the shamanic healing rituals a holism that is no longer present in modern medicine. Instead of impersonal "repair services at the treatment object" of physicians, who would understand no more much from health, but for it all the more from illness, the shamanism is characterized by empathy, mutual communication and mitmenschliche care, which has beyond the well-being of the patient even the well-being and woe of the entire community in the sense. For Hitzler, Gross, and Honer, moreover, shamanism is "a way of man's universal-historical efforts to gain mastery, through knowledge, over the powers within him that seem unfathomable to everyday understanding."