What is a scorched-earth policy?
Q: What is a scorched-earth policy?
A: A scorched-earth policy is a military strategy that aims to destroy anything that could be of use to the enemy.
Q: What are some examples of things that can be targeted in a scorched-earth policy?
A: Food sources, water supplies, transportation, communications, industrial resources, and even the local people themselves can be targeted in a scorched-earth policy.
Q: Can a scorched-earth policy be carried out in the military's own territory?
A: Yes, a scorched-earth policy can be carried out in the military's own territory or in enemy territory.
Q: What historic events are notable for scorched-earth tactics being used?
A: Scorched-earth tactics were used in the failed Swedish invasion of Russia, the Napoleonic invasion of Russia, William Tecumseh Sherman's March to the Sea in the American Civil War, colonel Kit Carson's subjugation of the American Navajo Indians, Lord Kitchener's advance against the Boers, the initial Soviet retreat commanded by Joseph Stalin during the German Army's invasion of the Soviet Union in the Second World War, the subsequent Nazi German retreat on the Eastern Front, and the burning 605-732 oil wells by retreating Iraqi military forces in the Gulf War.
Q: Why do armies use scorched-earth tactics?
A: Armies use scorched-earth tactics to deprive their enemy of resources and to weaken their ability to fight back.
Q: Can a scorched-earth policy have negative effects on the population of the targeted area?
A: Yes, a scorched-earth policy can have negative effects on the local population by depriving them of essential resources and leaving them vulnerable to further harm.
Q: Is a scorched-earth policy considered a humane strategy?
A: No, a scorched-earth policy is generally not considered a humane strategy as it involves intentionally destroying resources and potentially harming innocent civilians.
