Losses
There have been conflicting assessments of the immediate results of the attack. This is because smaller ships were often not counted or there were inconsistencies in the counting of damaged or destroyed ships. The dead and wounded were sometimes recorded separately by civilian, naval, and army affiliation; in some accounts, civilian casualties were not recorded at all.
So the following tally only approximates the destruction and casualties at Pearl Harbor.
Casualties on the US side
- 2403 Fallen
- 1178 wounded
- 18 ships had been sunk or - in some cases severely - damaged.
- 9 damaged ships
- 188 destroyed aircraft
- 159 damaged aircraft
Ultimately, all but three ships (the Arizona, the Oklahoma, and the Utah) of the sunk or badly damaged American units were recovered and returned to service before the end of World War II. Along with the Mississippi, five of the battleships sunk or damaged at Pearl Harbor (Maryland, West Virginia, Tennessee, California, and Pennsylvania) fought the Battle of Surigao Strait in 1944. In this last engagement between battleship fleets, fought by World War I battleships rather than the more modern Iowas and Yamatos, they sank the Japanese battleships Yamashiro and Fusō. The Nevada sailed for Normandy in 1944 as part of the Allied invasion fleet.
The worst loss for the U.S. was the deaths of the many innocent people. Of the 2403 dead, 2008 were Navy personnel, 109 Marine Corps, 218 Army. 78 civilians were among the dead. In addition, there were 1178 wounded. The Arizona, almost completely destroyed by the magazine explosion, is now a memorial; the wreck of the old battleship Utah, converted into an anti-aircraft training ship, was merely pulled into position where it would not be in the way. The last ship to be lifted was the capsized Oklahoma in 1943; the lengthy repair of her massive structural damage was no longer worthwhile at that point.
Medal of Honor awards
Fifteen soldiers were awarded the Medal of Honor, the highest award for valor in the U.S. Armed Forces, for their conduct during the attack, including 10 posthumously.
- Capt. Mervyn Sharp Bennion, commander of the battleship USS West Virginia (BB-48), posthumously.
- Lt. John William Finn, part of the repair force at Naval Air Station Kāneʻohe Bay.
- Ensign Francis Charles Flaherty, crewman of the battleship USS Oklahoma (BB-37), posthumously.
- Rear Admiral Samuel Glenn Fuqua, crew member of the battleship USS Arizona (BB-39).
- Chief Boatswain Edwin Joseph Hill, crewman of the battleship USS Nevada (BB-36), posthumously.
- Ensign Herbert Charpiot Jones, crewman of the battleship USS California (BB-44), posthumously.
- Rear Adm. Isaac Campbell Kidd, commander of the 1st Battleship Division, posthumously.
- Lieutenant Commander Jackson Charles Pharris, crew member of the battleship USS California (BB-44).
- Chief Radioman Thomas James Reeves, crewman of the battleship USS California (BB-44), posthumously.
- Captain Donald Kirby Ross, crew member of the battleship USS Nevada (BB-36).
- Machinist's Mate First Class Robert Raymond Scott, crewman of the battleship USS California (BB-44), posthumously.
- Chief Watertender Petar Herceg Tomich, crewman of the battleship USS Utah (BB-31), posthumously.
- Captain Franklin Van Valkenburgh, commander of the battleship USS Arizona (BB-39), posthumously.
- Seaman First Class James Richard Ward, crewman of the battleship USS Oklahoma (BB-37), posthumously.
- Captain Cassin Young, Commander of the Workshop Ship USS Vestal (AR-4)
Losses on the Japanese side
- about 65 pilots and submarine crewmen killed,
- about 29 aircraft destroyed,
- about 5 sunk two-man submarines,
- 1 prisoner (submarine commander Lieutenant Sakamaki Kazuo).
The low Japanese losses of only 29 aircraft exceeded even the most optimistic forecasts of the planners of the attack. Far higher losses had been expected. That these did not occur was due both to the complete surprise achieved and to the lack of combat readiness in which the American forces found themselves before the attack.
Strategic effects
Simultaneously with the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Japanese offensive in the Pacific began, Japanese troops invaded Thailand and landed in the Philippines. On the morning of December 10, Malayan time (barely 48 hours after the attack), Japanese bombers sank the Prince of Wales and the Repulse, battleships on the high seas and in full combat readiness for the first time in history. The sinking of these fast and modern ships by air forces alone ended the dominant role of the battleship in naval warfare up to that time.
With only one battleship left available, the non-Pearl Harbor Colorado, the U.S. Pacific Fleet no longer posed a threat, allowing Japan to deploy its entire fleet in Southeast Asia. Its now formidable naval and air superiority gave it the unrestricted initiative in the battle space, enabling the Japanese to overrun the nominally equally strong Allied ABDA forces (both sides had about eleven divisions of land forces in the battle area) within three months without much difficulty.
After the attack, the American Pacific Fleet was left only with defensive operations. Offensive operations were out of the question for a long time, since the Japanese fleet was now superior in every respect. It was possible to repair the lighter damaged battleships Maryland, Tennessee and Pennsylvania within three months in day and night work, so that together with the Colorado and the Idaho, Mississippi and New Mexico, which had been transferred back from the Atlantic, seven battleships were available again. However, this meant that they were clearly outgunned by the eleven Japanese battleships that had in the meantime been reinforced by the Yamato.
In the case of the aircraft carriers, the balance of power was even less favorable. Although no carriers were lost and reinforcements were provided by the Yorktown and Hornet, the five American carriers were opposed by eleven Japanese. Considerably more serious than the numerical inferiority was the qualitative difference in this now extremely important type of weapon. The Japanese had great experience in carrier operations, their crews were perfectly attuned, and their pilots had gained combat experience over China in the previous four years. On the American side, major carrier operations were nothing new, as they had practiced and evaluated attacks from aircraft carriers on the Panama Canal in prewar maneuvers. However, since U.S. carriers had been equipped with new aircraft types in the interim, they initially had problems coordinating activities on the flight deck. Six months later, when the carriers Enterprise and Hornet were to launch all aircraft for a joint attack in the Battle of Midway, it took too long after the first half of the aircraft had been launched to get the second half ready for takeoff. They were forced to abandon the joint attack and send the planes already launched off on their own before they blew too much fuel waiting. As a result, the units now attacking without fighter protection suffered heavy losses. More serious, however, was the lack of technical equipment, especially for fighters and the torpedo gun. The Grumman F4F was severely inferior to the Mitsubishi A6M in maneuverability, climb performance and speed, and it took until mid-1943 for suitable aircraft types (Grumman F6F and Vought F4U) to become available. However, new air combat tactics developed in the meantime by John S. "Jimmy" Thach enabled U.S. pilots to have real chances for aerial victories against the Japanese types even with the older aircraft. As for torpedo planes, the Douglas TBD was hopelessly outdated. Although it was replaced by the Grumman TBF after the Battle of Midway, the torpedoes themselves were slow and rarely worked. To save money, few tests had been conducted before the war, so no effective torpedoes were available until 1943. The performance of the Japanese Long Lance torpedo was never matched.
Since the surface fleet had no choice for the foreseeable future but to try to hold the position as best it could until reinforcements came from the shipyards in the form of new ships, the submarines became the only weapon with which offensive action could be taken against Japan. Chester W. Nimitz, one of the few admirals to emerge from the submarine force, was therefore appointed as the new commander of the Pacific Fleet. Subsequently, the American submarines waged a tonnage war against Japan, which depended on its sea links, that was so successful that today it is regarded by all sides as one of the main causes of the American victory in the Pacific.
At the time, the Japanese high command considered the battle a strategic success that exceeded its wildest expectations. The Japanese fleet had operated at the limit of its range, surprising the enemy to an extent hardly thought possible and eliminating its entire battle fleet in one fell swoop. In view of the unexpectedly low friendly losses of only 29 aircraft, the absence of the aircraft carriers and the sparing of the docks and oil depots appeared as minor blemishes in an otherwise incredibly perfect Japanese victory.
Today, however, the attack is considered a complete strategic failure on all counts. The fact that no aircraft carrier was sunk was still excusable, since the Japanese high command could neither foresee nor react to her absence when it was learned through the consulate that the Lexington had also sailed on 5 December. The attack could only be carried out on 7 December; the Japanese task force had no fuel reserves that would have allowed the attack to be postponed, much less to stop the entire offensive in Southeast Asia on short notice. Nagumo's failure to attack and destroy the base and its facilities, however, was very detrimental to the Japanese. The loss of the only docks in the Central Pacific would undoubtedly have hit the United States the hardest. That this was not done is evidence of a misplacement of priorities both by Nagumo himself and by the high command, which later considered the decision to call off the attack to be correct.
The extent to which the abort of the attack without a 3rd attack wave is to be seen as a misjudgement of the situation is controversial in some quarters. It is true that the destruction of the docks and fuel tanks would have considerably hindered the U.S. in its strategic planning and probably forced it to retreat to the U.S. west coast. However, this fact is offset by the fact that Japanese forces in the attack fleet had lacked the tactical means for successful attacks on a major naval base. Because of the composition of the carrier-based air forces available, it is highly likely that only an attack by dive bombers would have been an option, and these had already suffered some of the heaviest losses in the first two waves of attacks (14 dive bombers were lost and 41 damaged in the 2nd attack wave alone). The success of a 3rd attack wave must therefore be doubted, since the air defenses at Pearl Harbor had recovered quickly. Moreover, only arming the attack aircraft with 250-kilogram bombs would have been possible, making effective strikes even more difficult. The impact of carrier aircraft attacking a secured and prepared base was demonstrated a few months later in the attack on Midway.
The attack on the battleships is also often criticized: since they sank in shallow harbor water, they could nevertheless be raised and repaired relatively easily. If Japan, according to the original war plan (valid before the transfer of the fleet from San Diego to Pearl Harbor), had waited for the fleet to sail to reinforce the Philippines under attack and then sunk the battleships on the high seas, they would have been permanently lost. In addition, the sunk battleships proved unsuitable for the battleship's new role as an aircraft carrier escort because of their slow speed and mainly supported amphibious landings with their artillery during the war. Moreover, in addition to the loss of materiel, there would have been a much higher number of human casualties on the high seas that would have had to be replaced. The situation after Pearl Harbor, on the other hand, was different: many sailors and specialists were still available after the attack and were practically ready to fight. In addition to these considerations, there was another fact: The sinking of the older battleships ultimately left the U.S. with no other option but to concentrate on building aircraft carriers to stand up to the Japanese navy. In this way, Pearl Harbor accelerated the naval strategic paradigm shift. During the war, the U.S. commissioned 18 large fleet carriers and 77 escort carriers alone.
In conclusion, it must be stated in this context that the attack on Pearl Harbor - as serious as it may have been - was not only a strategic failure for the Empire of Japan, but actually already marked the path of the war's course. One of the biggest mistakes, in the eyes of some authors, was the fact that Japan entered the war with the U.S. and its potential without developing a precise strategy of how this conflict should lead to the desired result, and could not revise this negligence even in the following years of the war.
Political impact
The most serious consequence was the effect of the attack on public opinion in the USA: isolationism and pacifism lost their influence at a stroke. On December 8, the U.S. officially declared war on Japan; the declaration of war passed with only one dissenting vote in Congress, which had previously been divided between isolationists and interventionists. Four days later, Germany and Italy, who had also been surprised by the attack, declared war on the U.S., officially entering the European part of the war as well.
The surprise attack was considered underhanded and perfidious in the U.S. because it was carried out without a prior declaration of war (even the note delivered belatedly on December 7 contained only the breaking off of negotiations) and came as a complete surprise to the U.S. population. In the U.S., the term Pearl Harbor has since been used as a metaphor for a devastating, unprovoked, and unforeseen attack. December 7, 1941 is often referred to as the Day of Infamy
, after the opening of President Roosevelt? /i with which he sought congressional approval for the declaration of war the next day. The desire for revenge and victory over Japan led to a strong rush of volunteers to the recruiting offices of the armed forces. Japanese Americans were the first to feel the hatred; they were the victims of numerous attacks and were eventually imprisoned in internment camps. In 1988, President Ronald Reagan apologized on behalf of the U.S. government for this behavior based on "racism, prejudice, and war hysteria."
To investigate the attack, President Roosevelt appointed a commission of inquiry chaired by Constitutional Judge Owen Roberts. On January 28, 1942, the commission's report declared Admiral Kimmel and General Short to be primarily responsible for the defeat. They were accused of neglect of duty due to the lack of combat readiness of their forces. They had not taken warnings seriously enough, and Short in particular had made the airfields easy targets by his decision to park all aircraft in the center. Both commanders had already been relieved of their posts by mid-December 1941, automatically reverting from their previous 4-star ranks (but only temporarily awarded for their command) to 2-star ranks. Their careers were effectively ended. The view taken by the Roberts Commission was controversial from the beginning; many saw Kimmel and Short as scapegoats who would have been acquitted at any time if indicted by a military tribunal. In 1944, two commissions, one of the Army (Army Pearl Harbor Board) and one of the Navy (Navy Court of Inquiry), conducted another investigation of the attack (in all, after the Roberts Commission, seven investigations of the attack were conducted by 1946). In fact, the Navy Court of Inquiry found that Admiral Kimmel was not to blame; the readiness of the fleet was appropriate to the situation known to Admiral Kimmel. Particular emphasis was placed on the fact that the ships' anti-aircraft guns were ready for action and opened fire immediately when the attack began, while the Army's anti-aircraft guns sometimes waited hours for ammunition. General Short, on the other hand, was massively criticized for not anticipating the possibility of an attack and for not mentioning Pearl Harbor as a possible target in his war warning. The Army Pearl Harbor Board found that General Short was indeed guilty of dereliction of duty, but also criticized the Army leadership in Washington, particularly General Marshall. The Army leadership had also failed to recognize the possibility of an attack and had not corrected the Army's known low level of readiness in Hawaii, even though it anticipated imminent war with Japan. Both reports, however, were kept secret during the war, partly because several of the officers criticized now held high positions where they were doing work judged to be outstanding; their replacement was considered detrimental to the conduct of the war. Another reason was the role that the decoded Japanese radio messages had in the commissions' evaluation. The fact that the Japanese code could be read, however, had to remain secret during the still ongoing war.
Finally, on May 25, 1999, the Senate passed a resolution by a vote of 52 to 47 that cleared Kimmel and Short of all charges and posthumously elevated them to the 4-star rank that all other ranking U.S. officers of World War II had received no later than their retirement from the armed forces.
In Japan, the attack provoked mixed feelings. Admiral Yamamoto was appalled that the Japanese diplomatic note had been delivered only after the attack. This exacerbated what he saw as Japan's unpromising position to win the war from the start. He is said to have spent the day after Pearl Harbor sunk in depression while his staff celebrated. While there is no evidence that he ever uttered the famous phrase "I fear all we have accomplished is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve." was ever said by him in the film Tora! Tora! Tora!" attributed to him. According to contemporary witnesses, however, the phrase accurately reflects Yamamoto's mood after the attack. The attack came as much as a surprise to the Japanese population as it did to the American, and although the Japanese government had been trying to create anti-American sentiment through propaganda for some time, many Japanese seem to have been horrified that they were now at war with the United States, a country that not a few Japanese admired. The Japanese, however, seem to have accepted the government's justification that the war was inevitable and subsequently supported the war policy until the Japanese surrender.