Skip to content
Home

King in Prussia — the princely title of the Prussian rulers

A concise history of the title 'King in Prussia': its legal meaning, origins in the early 18th century, diplomatic background, change to 'King of Prussia' in 1772, and its political legacy.

Overview

The style "King in Prussia" was the formal royal title adopted by the rulers of Prussia in the early 18th century and used until the later 18th century. It signified a limited kingship tied to the Duchy of Prussia — territory lying outside the boundaries of the Holy Roman Empire — while the same princes continued to hold titles inside the Empire. This careful wording reflected the complex patchwork of sovereignty in central Europe and the diplomatic constraints faced by German princes.

Image gallery

1 Image

Meaning and constitutional nuance

The phrase "in Prussia" rather than "of Prussia" indicated that the bearer claimed kingship for lands outside the Holy Roman Empire but did not assert a royal rank within imperial territories such as Brandenburg. The holders of the title were simultaneously Electors and Margraves within the Empire and sovereign dukes or princes where their lands lay beyond imperial jurisdiction. The distinction mattered to other European courts and to the emperor because full royal status inside the Empire would have altered the balance of rank among German princes.

Origins and diplomatic background

The assumption of the royal style was achieved through negotiation and international politics. The Prussian ruler secured permission to use the royal title in return for supporting imperial and allied policies during the wars of the period. This agreement reflected bargaining between the Prussian ruler and the imperial court over recognition and precedence. For more on the region ruled, see Prussia, and for the diplomatic framework of imperial authority see the Holy Roman Emperor.

Contemporary examples and key figures

Early adopters of the title included the first Prussian king and his immediate successors, who balanced their new royal dignity with remaining responsibilities and ranks within the Empire. The title appears in official documents, court protocol and foreign correspondence of the time. The dynasts who used it are often remembered by epithets in later histories; among the best known are the first king and the ruler who later expanded Prussian power and territory. For the broader military and diplomatic context see the War of the Spanish Succession.

Transition to "King of Prussia" and later developments

In the 1770s the reigning Prussian monarch adopted the more expansive style "King of Prussia" after territorial gains that increased the practical unity and importance of his realm. That change reflected altered political realities: a stronger, territorially enlarged state and a weakened imperial center that could no longer enforce earlier limitations on royal titulature. The ruler who made that change is commonly known in history as Frederick II (Frederick the Great). The collapse of the imperial order in the early 19th century removed the institutional basis for the old distinction.

Significance and legacy

The technical wording "King in Prussia" is a useful case study in how titles, law and diplomacy interacted in early modern Europe. It shows how sovereigns used language to negotiate status without provoking larger constitutional conflicts. The evolution of the title also foreshadowed the rise of Prussia as a leading German state and its central role in later processes of consolidation and nation-building in the 19th century.

  • Key concept: distinction between sovereignty inside and outside the Holy Roman Empire.
  • Illustrates diplomacy: titles could be traded for military and political support.
  • Legacy: the change from "in" to "of" marks a step in state centralization and expansion.

Coronation 1701

Main article: Royal coronation of Frederick III of Brandenburg

In 1701 the Habsburg Leopold I was in urgent need of the military help of Brandenburg-Prussia in the War of the Spanish Succession. Thus he was prepared to recognise a royal crown for the Elector. In the corresponding agreement between Vienna and Berlin, at Frederick's insistence, the formula that the Emperor crown the Elector or create the Prussian crown was deliberately omitted. The crown treaty of 17 November 1700 was signed by the Emperor only after the Elector had entered into an alliance with him. The Emperor promised that he would work for the recognition of the new royal title also in the Empire and with other powers.

The Elector was anxious that his crown should express his unlimited sovereignty. The Prussian estates were not consulted and were only informed in December 1700 that there would be a coronation feast. For the coronation act on 17 January 1701 Frederick made use of various European traditions. He put the crown on himself, after which he had himself anointed by the Calvinist bishop. It is estimated that the coronation festivities cost the state about twice as much as the Hohenzollerns earned annually. With one exception, Frederick's successors dispensed with expensive and pompous coronation ceremonies.

Development until 1848

The second king in Prussia, Frederick William I, united the Prussian administrative tops in the General Directorate, and he further restricted the privileges of the estates. He surrounded himself with a personal circle of advisors, the Tobacco College.

Frederick II (from 1740), on the other hand, destroyed the uniformity of state governance by establishing new authorities alongside the Directorate-General and assigning individual tasks to commissioners. Moreover, he no longer presided over the Directorate-General in person, but communicated with the ministers in writing. He ruled "from the cabinet," his private chambers, through cabinet secretaries, who thus gained great influence. They could overturn all the ministers' decisions.

The new King Frederick William II therefore issued an instruction on 28 September 1786 prescribing weekly plenary sessions. However, the basic problem remained that thematic and regional responsibilities existed side by side on an equal footing. Under Frederick William III. (from 1797) a certain improvement occurred in that the heads of departments and their portfolios became de facto more independent. However, this was not yet formally a collegial ministerial government.

In the period following the defeat by France in 1807, the Stein-Hardenberg reforms took place. An Edict of Organization of 1808 created a ministerial government. Ministers were given direct access to the king; the king's orders required a ministerial countersignature. In the years 1810-1822 Prussia under Hardenberg had a chancellor as senior head of government; otherwise the government was collegial.

Stein's plan for the Council of State was unsuccessful. The Council of State would have been responsible for legislation and, among other things, would have controlled the administration (in this respect comparable to a parliament). The king would have presided, but his self-government would have been further restricted. In fact, the Council of State met for its first session in 1817, but only as an advisory body. Its members were appointed by the king or were members by birth, like the king's sons, or by office, like the chancellor. In practice, however, the Council of State had the greatest influence because it was knowledgeable and acted independently and responsibly.

Despite repeated promises, the king did not issue a constitution and did not establish a Prussian parliament, only provincial estates. Thus the Prussian monarchy remained a late absolutist or semi-absolutist state. Despite hopes to the contrary in 1840, Frederick William IV did not appoint a senior head of government or fulfill his predecessor's constitutional promise. It remained with the unreal idea that in the 19th century a king could continue to lead a personal regiment as in the times of Frederick the Great.

Questions and answers

Q: What was the title used by the rulers of Prussia from 1702 to 1772?

A: The title used by the rulers of Prussia from 1702 to 1772 was King in Prussia.

Q: Why did the rulers of Prussia want to be Kings?

A: The rulers of Prussia, who were also Princes and Margraves of Brandenburg, wanted to be Kings.

Q: Why did the Holy Roman Emperor not allow them the title of King?

A: The Holy Roman Emperor did not allow them the title of King.

Q: What did Emperor Leopold I allow Frederick to call himself?

A: Emperor Leopold I allowed Frederick to call himself King in Prussia.

Q: Was Frederick only regarded as King outside the Empire?

A: Yes, Frederick was only regarded as King outside the Empire.

Q: In 1772, what did Frederick II annex and what did he decide to call himself?

A: In 1772, Frederick II annexed most of Poland and decided to call himself King of Prussia.

Q: When did the Holy Roman Empire cease to exist?

A: The Holy Roman Empire ceased to exist in 1806.

Related articles

Author

AlegsaOnline.com King in Prussia — the princely title of the Prussian rulers

URL: https://en.alegsaonline.com/art/53544

Share