What is judicial interpretation?
Q: What is judicial interpretation?
A: Judicial interpretation is the process by which the judiciary explains how they interpret the law.
Q: How is judicial interpretation made in Common law?
A: Judicial interpretation in Common law is made up of guidelines derived from case law.
Q: Where do the guidelines for judicial interpretation in Common law come from?
A: The guidelines for judicial interpretation in Common law come from previous judicial decisions.
Q: What is the difference between Common law and constitutional law in terms of judicial interpretation?
A: In Common law, judicial interpretation is made up of guidelines derived from case law. In contrast, in constitutional law, there are different methods of judicial interpretation.
Q: What are the different methods of judicial interpretation in constitutional law?
A: The different methods of judicial interpretation in constitutional law include a textualist approach, an originalist approach, a living document approach, and a purposive approach.
Q: What is a textualist approach to judicial interpretation in constitutional law?
A: A textualist approach to judicial interpretation in constitutional law involves interpreting the text of the constitution as it is written.
Q: What is a living document approach to judicial interpretation in constitutional law?
A: A living document approach to judicial interpretation in constitutional law involves interpreting the constitution in light of present-day circumstances, taking into account changes in society and culture.
