Skip to content
Home

Hunter-gatherer societies

People whose subsistence depends mainly on hunting wild animals and gathering wild plants; mobile, diverse societies that shaped human evolution and persisted into the modern era.

Overview

Hunter-gatherer societies are human groups whose primary means of subsistence are the procurement of wild animals and plants rather than the cultivation of crops or the keeping of domesticated herds as a main food source. Such communities rely on a combination of wild foods obtained through foraging and hunting, and they often seasonally move across territories to follow available resources. The term describes a wide variety of cultures that differ in technology, environment, and social organization.

Image gallery

10 Images

Characteristics and adaptations

Although diverse, many hunter-gatherer groups share features adapted to living directly from their environments. Typical traits include:

  • Mobility or seasonal rounds rather than permanent large-scale settlements.
  • Deep knowledge of local plants, animals, and ecological cycles.
  • Tools and technologies focused on hunting, trapping, fishing, and processing plant foods, often including stone tools, bows, nets, and cooking techniques.
  • Flexible social arrangements with smaller group sizes that can split and re-form in response to resource availability.
  • High dietary diversity compared with early agricultural diets, with reliance on whatever edible species are available.

Origins and archaeological evidence

Evidence from stone tools, bones with cut marks, hearths, and camp sites shows that human ancestors depended on hunting and gathering for most of our species' existence. The Paleolithic period records long-term use of this lifestyle, and many important developments—language, coordinated hunting, controlled use of fire, and sophisticated toolmaking—are associated with hunter-gatherer lifeways. The widespread adoption of plant and animal domestication beginning in several regions after the last Ice Age led to agriculture, but the transition was gradual and uneven.

Social organization and economy

Social structures among hunter-gatherers vary from relatively egalitarian bands to more hierarchical groups, depending on resource distribution and group size. Sharing of food and cooperative child-rearing are common strategies that reduce risk from variable returns on hunting or gathering. Exchange networks can connect distant groups, and spiritual or ritual practices are often tied to animal and plant management. Where environmental productivity is high, some groups developed semi-sedentary life and stored surplus, blurring lines with early farmers; in other cases, mobility remained essential.

Continuity, interaction, and modern examples

Some populations maintained predominantly hunting-and-gathering lifeways well into recent centuries and continue to do so today, adapting to contact with agricultural, pastoral, or industrial neighbors. Interactions include trade, intermarriage, and shifts toward mixed economies that include limited cultivation or livestock. When describing these dynamics, comparisons to intensive farming should note differences in population density, land use, and long-term ecological impacts. See also discussions of the transition to agriculture and varied outcomes across regions (farming contexts).

Notable distinctions and misconceptions

Popular images sometimes portray hunter-gatherers as uniformly primitive or short-lived, but ethnographic and archaeological research shows complex knowledge systems, resilient resource management, and cultural diversity. The boundary between hunting-gathering, pastoralism, and agriculture is frequently fluid: many groups practiced mixed strategies or shifted over time. Contemporary scholarship emphasizes variability, adaptation, and the continuing relevance of traditional ecological knowledge for biodiversity and conservation.

Land use and nutrition

The economic form of unspecialized hunting and gathering usually requires (depending on the respective food supply of the inhabited climatic zone) sufficiently large tail areas, which can only be used extensively due to their extent. In the occupation economy common among hunter-gatherers, a person needs an area of about 20 square kilometers in which to roam in search of food. In the process, the vegetation and the naturally occurring species composition are not deliberately changed.

In terms of area, this subsistence system uses by far the least energy. Unless modern technologies (weapons, tools, vehicles) are used, it is exclusively a matter of metabolised energy in the form of muscle power. Although this leads to a low yield without surpluses, which is clearly below that of all agricultural systems, the energy efficiency in contrast is very high and surpasses all engineered economic systems many times over: the energy yield is about six times the input and the impact on the natural balance is extremely low (HANPP <0.1 %). In terms of adequate food supply, these constellations allow only very low population densities: For southern and eastern Africa, for example, 0.8 to 2 inhabitants/km² are given as a maximum.

The composition of the food is very different in unspecialized groups and also varies greatly in the course of the year. The more inhospitable the habitat, the larger the "managed" area must be, the longer the distances and the smaller the number of people in the hordes.

Some studies of recent peoples of the subtropics and tropics have found that 60 to 70, and in individual cases up to 80 percent, of their food is gathered (mainly vegetable). Thus, South and Southeast Asian jungle peoples feed almost entirely on the gathering economy. Some Indian ethnic groups (such as the Malapantaram and Aranandan of Kerala) do not even have bows or spears. The emphasis in the warm countries is often on vegetable food even where game and fish are abundant. It is likely that the uncertain quotas of prey, the risks of hunting and the easy availability of gathering food are major factors in this decision. There are exceptions, however, such as the Huaorani in the Amazon lowlands of Ecuador, who feed primarily on meat. For other ethnic groups - especially in the far north - an average of 65 percent animal food has been determined, in extreme tundra regions up to 90 percent. Here, plant food is only available from May to September at the most.

The findings of paleoanthropology on the diet of Stone Age people provide evidence of a predominantly plant-based diet; animal food did not play a decisive role and was often limited to insects as a source of fat and small game as a source of animal protein.

In the case of specialized game or field hunters who subsisted primarily by hunting certain common large animal species (bison, caribou, marine mammals, small game), by fishing in permanently fish-rich waters, or by harvesting masses of wild fruits (wild rice, black oak, sweet grasses, sago palm), different standards must be applied to both land use and diet. They were semi-nomadic, semi-sedentary, or sedentary when resource density was high (such as game ranges, densely stocked grasslands, riparian zones of large bodies of water), lived in larger, more socially complex groups, and used resources more intensively.

Such complex societies already existed 20,000 years ago (for example in the Dordogne, Ukraine, Japan, Denmark, the Levant). The finds there suggest higher population densities, division of labour and specialisation, barter and long-distance transport, as well as greater social stratification.

Hunt

Hunting methods

Hounding as an endurance hunt

The oldest hunting method of man is probably the hunt in the form of persistence hunting. This is based on the superior running endurance of humans compared to almost all mammals. Humans, who are sufficiently well equipped for longer, faster runs, can cool down effectively due to their approximately two million sweat glands as well as their weak body hair, and can therefore keep up a longer run for hours. The Khoisan hunters of southern Africa still kill fast hoofed animals such as zebras or steenboks without any weapons at all, running after them until they collapse, exhausted. Some American Indian tribes also ­hunted pronghorns as endurance hunters. Some Aborigines in Australia hunted kangaroos in this traditional way.

According to a model calculation published in 2020, endurance hunts can be sustained for up to 5 1⁄2 hours under the climatic conditions of the Kalahari without the need or necessity for the native hunters there (anatomically modern humans and Homo erectus) to carry water.

This method of hunting differs from that of most predators. For example, cheetahs, which can reach speeds of over 100 kilometres per hour for short periods of time, can only sustain this speed for a few minutes and must reach their prey in one run or it will escape. Other predators also can only sustain high speeds for a short time or use other tactics such as being encircled by a pack.

Driven Hunt

When Cabeza de Vaca was the first white man to come into contact with many of the Indian tribes of North America, beginning in 1528, he witnessed drive hunts, including drive hunts with all-round fire. He described hunting with fire thus, "They also kill deer by enclosing them with fires; and this method they also use to deprive the animals of food, so that necessity compels them to seek it where the Indians want it.... In this way they satisfy their hunger two or three times a year...". Another very old method of hunting may be "cliff-driving," in which the game was panicked and driven over the edge of a cliff.

Trapping

Trapping has been documented for the Aborigines of Australia, among others.

Hunting weapons

Very old is the hunting with throwing sticks especially on birds and smaller animals and with spears on bigger game.

Litterbug

Main article: Limb

In addition to humans, monkeys have also been observed to throw sticks or hard fruit from trees at approaching predators. Therefore, the use of throwing woods is thought to be older than that of the spear, a stick sharpened at least at one end, which flies straight and penetrates the game or the opponent. The wood spinning in flight could, for example, stun a bird by the force delivered on impact (hit zone head), or prevent it from flying away by temporarily paralyzing or breaking bones when hit on the wings. Mature constructions in the hands of a skilled hunter also kill other and larger prey.

The first item found during the excavation in Schöningen (see below) was a presumed throwing stick: a stick sharpened at both ends and about 50 centimetres long. Impressive and, for example, also proven in ancient Europe are the throwing sticks that the Australian Aborigines used for hunting (boomerangs). They could weigh up to 2 kilograms and be 1.30 metres long. Skilled throwers could throw such a boomerang up to 100 metres. These hunting boomerangs do not return to the thrower, but are optimized for a straight and stable flight. They were also used as digging sticks to dig up roots. Throwing sticks with an age of 20,000 years have been found in the European Carpathians. Also preserved are depictions from Ancient Egypt showing bird hunting with throwing sticks.

Spears

Spears were already used by early representatives of the genus Homo such as Homo erectus (Homo heidelbergensis).

The oldest hunting weapons found so far are the Schöningen spears, which are about 300,000 years old. During lignite mining in Schöningen, Lower Saxony, 7 spears made of spruce wood were found amidst 18 wild horse skeletons. These spears had a length of between 1.82 and 2.50 metres and were made of the harder base wood, their centre of gravity was at the tip. The throwing characteristics of replica spears resemble those of modern women's competition spears, with a hunting range of about 15 meters. At that time, Europe was inhabited by Homo heidelbergensis, which later gave rise to Neanderthal man; modern man (Homo sapiens) spread to Europe no earlier than 45,000 years ago.

Thousands of bones were found in the area of the early Stone ­Age hunting camp of Bilzingsleben, 60 percent of which were bones of large animals, including wild cattle, wild horses, bears, rhinoceroses and elephant calves.

Lance and harpoon

The Neanderthals who emerged from the European occurrence of Homo erectus also hunted with lances, i.e. sharpened wooden sticks as thrusting weapons, which, however, could also be equipped with a leaf-shaped stone blade. In the German Lehringen, for example, a yew wood lance 2.38 metres long was found in the ribcage of a forest elephant skeleton. Neanderthal skeletons in many cases show traces of bone fractures in the arms and head. Among all historical and modern human groups, archaeologists found a similar frequency of bone fractures only among modern rodeo riders - whose cause of bone fractures is not mainly due to falls, but comes from the hooves of the animals. Neanderthals were also exposed to this danger when hunting big game at close range.

The lance was used as a hunting weapon until modern times, especially for hunting wild boar (compare Saufeder).

As a thrust-weapon mostly with barbs to the hunt on fish, the people developed the harpoon.

Spearthrower

A doubling of the range of spears was achieved by humans through the development of the spear slinger. The spear sling was developed in Europe during the last ice age. It is a hunting weapon consisting of the projectile and the throwing device. The oldest find can be assigned to the late Solutrean (about 24,000 to 20,000 years ago). However, the predominant part from stratigraphically secured contexts comes from the Magdalénien IV (about 15,400-14,000 years ago). The main focus of their distribution is southwest France, some finds come from Switzerland, Germany and Spain. Worldwide, the spear sling is archaeologically and ethnographically documented in Micronesia, Australia, New Guinea, and among the Eskimo. In Central America the spearthrower was used as a weapon of war.

bow and arrow

At even greater distances and up to the tops of trees and flying birds, the bow extended the hunting range of the people. Some tribes learned to poison the arrowheads, so that they could also kill large animals with small arrows, for which spears were previously needed.

Nets and snares

As people began to process fiber, they also began to hunt animals with snares, as well as catch birds and fish with nets.

Blowpipe

A few tribes of hunter-gatherers also used blowguns, with which they shot mostly poisoned arrows. For example, Indian tribes in the rainforests of South America hunt primates in the highest treetops with blowpipes about three meters long and curare or poison dart frog-poisoned arrows.

Related articles

Author

AlegsaOnline.com Hunter-gatherer societies

URL: https://en.alegsaonline.com/art/45761

Share