Derivation of the numerical value
Algebraic
The definition given in the introduction

reads with the right side dissolved and after conversion

respectively with
follows:

Multiplication by
gives the quadratic equation

with the two solutions
and
which can be obtained, for example, by applying the midnight formula or also by quadratic addition.
Since of these two values only the positive one can be considered for the golden number, it follows that

Geometric
The approach is the definition given in the introduction

with a major
.
On a number line, first the numerical value
designated
as point and then the major
plotted
as numerical value resulting in the intersection point
. After establishing the perpendicular on the line
in
line
onto the perpendicular from the point
intersection
If we now halve
in
this produces the numerical value
The points
and
are vertices of the right triangle with cathets
and 
With the help of the Pythagorean theorem

thus obtains the hypotenuse 
Finally, an arc is required around
(numerical value
) with radius
which
intersects the number line in
shows the minor
as a line and
gives the numerical value
The numerical value of
can thus be read directly on the number line:

Summarised it also results in

The Golden Sequence of Numbers
| Golden number sequence for a0 = 1 |
|  |  | |
| 4 | ≈ 6,854 |  |
| 3 | ≈ 4,236 |  |
| 2 | ≈ 2,618 |  |
| 1 | ≈ 1,618 |  |
| 0 | = 1,000 |  |
| −1 | ≈ 0,618 |  |
| −2 | ≈ 0,382 |  |
| −3 | ≈ 0,236 |  |
| −4 | ≈ 0,146 |  |
For a given number
sequence
for
construct. This sequence has the property that each three consecutive links
form a golden section, that is, it holds
and
for all 
This sequence plays an important role in the theory of proportions in art and architecture, because for a given length
further lengths can be created that appear harmonious. In this way, even objects of very different dimensions, such as window and room widths, can be related by means of the golden section and entire series of mutually harmonious dimensions can be created.
It is worth mentioning that for
the decimal places for
,
and
not differ because they are positive and the difference between them is an integer. Thus the decimal number here is always x,618,033,988,75... with x= 0, 1, 2.
Connection with the Fibonacci numbers
| Ratios of successiveFibonacci numbers |
|  |  |  | Deviation to in %. |
| 01 | 01 | = 1,0000 | −38,0000 |
| 01 | 02 | = 2,0000 | +23,0000 |
| 02 | 03 | = 1,5000 | −7,300 |
| 03 | 05 | ≈ 1,6667 | +3,000 |
| 05 | 08 | = 1,6000 | −1,100 |
| 08 | 13 | = 1,6250 | +0,430 |
| 13 | 21 | ≈ 1,6154 | −0,160 |
| 21 | 34 | ≈ 1,6190 | +0,063 |
| 34 | 55 | ≈ 1,6176 | −0,024 |
| 55 | 89 | ≈ 1,6182 | 0+0,0091 |
| 89 | 144 | ≈ 1,6180 | 0−0,0035 |
| 144 | 233 | ≈ 1,6181 | 0+0,0013 |
Closely related to the golden section is the infinite sequence of Fibonacci numbers (see below the sections on the Middle Ages and the Renaissance):
1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233 …
The next number in this sequence is obtained as the sum of the two preceding numbers. The ratio of two consecutive numbers in the Fibonacci sequence tends towards the golden ratio (see table). The recursive formation law
means namely

Provided that this ratio
converges towards a limit , the following must apply to it

This reasoning also applies to generalised Fibonacci sequences with any two initial members.
The members of the Fibonacci sequence
for all
calculated via Binet's formula:

where 
This formula yields the correct initial values
and
and satisfies the recursive equation
for all
with
.
Approximation properties of the golden number
As indicated above, the golden number
an irrational number, i.e. it cannot be represented as a fraction of two integers. It is sometimes called the "most irrational" of all numbers because it can be approximated (in a special number-theoretical sense) particularly badly by rational numbers (Diophantine approximation). This will be
illustrated in the following by a comparison with the likewise irrational circular number π latter is much better approximable than
for example, π {\displaystyle
approximated by the fraction
with a deviation of only about 0.00126. Such a small error would generally only be expected with a much larger denominator.
The golden number can be constructed directly from the requirement of the worst possible approximability by rational numbers. To understand this, consider the following procedure for approximating arbitrary numbers by a fraction using the example of the number π
First, this number is decomposed into its integer part and a remainder smaller than
:
. The inverse of this remainder is a number greater than
It can therefore again be decomposed into an integer part and a remainder smaller than
: π
. If the same is done with this remainder and all the following ones, then the infinite continued fraction development of the number π follows. 

If this continued fraction evolution is terminated after finitely many steps, then for π
the known approximations
,
,
,
, ... which rapidly
tend towards π For every single one of these fractions, it holds that there is no fraction with a denominator of at most equal size that
better approximates π This is true in general:
If the continued fraction expansion of an irrational number
is terminated at any point, then a rational number results.
which
optimally approximates among all rational numbers with denominator ≤
.
In the continued fraction above, an integer appears before each plus sign. The larger this number, the smaller the fraction in whose denominator it appears, and therefore the smaller the error that occurs when the infinite continued fraction is terminated before this fraction. The largest number in the continued fraction section above is
. This is why
is such a good approximation for π 
Reversing this argumentation, it now follows that the approximation is particularly bad if the number before the plus sign is particularly small. The smallest permissible number there is
. The continued fraction, which contains only ones, can therefore be approximated particularly badly by rational numbers and is in this sense the "most irrational of all numbers".
For the golden number, however,
(see above), from which, by repeated application, we get

Since the continued fraction expansion of the golden number
contains only ones, it belongs to the numbers that are particularly difficult to approximate rationally. If its continued fraction development breaks off at any point, a fraction of two consecutive Fibonacci numbers is always obtained.
Another curious designation is the following: In the theory of dynamical systems, numbers whose infinite continued fraction representation contains only ones from any point on are called "noble numbers". Since the golden number has only ones in its continued fraction, it can (jokingly) be called the "noblest of all numbers".
From an algebraic-number-theoretical point of view
The golden section is an algebraic number as the zero of the polynomial
Because the polynomial is normalised and all coefficients are integers, the golden section is even whole. Let
, then
is a body extension of degree 2. Thus
a square number body. It is the real quadratic number body of smallest discriminant, namely 5 (the real quadratic number body with next larger discriminant is
with discriminant 8). Let
be the associated integer ring. Because
is integer,
, but more than that: because of

is the golden section even unit of the integer ring
. Its multiplicative inverse is
. This can also be shown algebraically just by knowing the minimal polynomial 

However, the golden section is not only a unit of the holistic ring
but even a fundamental unit of the holistic ring. That is, each element of
is of the form
with
. Moreover,
form a
-basis of
. That is, each element of
be uniquely written as
with
write. A simple consequence of the next paragraph is that also
a
-base of
. Here
.
The whole boundary points of the convex hull of
, which are important, for example, for the desingularisation of peaks of Hilbert modular surfaces, are
given by the even powers of The fact that these boundary points all
lie in i.e. are all units, is equivalent to the singularity of the rational curves in the Hilbert modular surface associated with
the body living "infinitely" above it in the resolution of the top.
Other mathematical properties
- From following infinite chain root can be derived
:

- The square
and any higher integer power of
represented as the sum of an integer multiple of
and an integer multiple of 1. The fundamental significance of the golden section for quasiperiodic lattices is based on this property (see quasicrystal). - More precisely,
(where
the
th Fibonacci number).

and

is the full acute angle and
half the obtuse exterior angle of the pentagram. Occasionally the role of the golden section for the pentagon is described as comparably important as that of the circle number π
for the circle.
- The golden section can also be expressed with the help of the Eulerian number and the hyperbolic areasinus function:

- Substituting
into the geometric series formula ∑ k = 

, because
.
or:
.