Overview
→ Main article: Fur types
The origin of the furs can be divided into:
- Furs produced as a by-product of livestock farming and meat production (about 40 % of fur production)
- hides and skins of animals which are hunted independently of fur production because they are or are perceived to be pests or nuisances
- Furs of fur animals which are hunted, trapped or farmed solely for their fur.
When farm animals are slaughtered, the skins produced include those of lamb and sheep, (Persian, many different breeds of sheep), rabbit (rabbit skin), goat and kid, cow and calf, horse and foal, reindeer (or pijiki) and kangaroo (wallaby skin).
The types of use were subject to considerable historical change. Thus, individual breeds of sheep and rabbits are bred specifically for their special fur characteristics. These include, for example, the Karakul sheep (curly Persian), the Merino sheep (silky, for wool and lamb veloure), the Chinchilla and Rexkanin. Farm animals such as hamsters, guinea pigs, horses and donkeys or even dogs can in principle be considered as fur suppliers. They were and are also used as meat suppliers in some countries and cultures, depending on the food taboo. The fur supplier beaver was a popular fasting food in the Middle Ages, opossum and swamp beaver (Nutriafell) are partly still consumed today. Seals are a staple food of the Eskimos.
Wild catch still accounts for about 15 % of the global supply. Of particular importance are the furs of animals that are hunted as pests or nuisances. These include wild rabbits, hamsters, mole fur, New Zealand possum, marten, polecat, weasel, nutria, muskrat and raccoon. Certain types of traps are prohibited in the EU.
In 2008, the main share of farmed fur animals went to the mink mink, followed by sheep, silver fox, blue fox, marten dog (sea fox fur), chinchilla, nutria, sable and polecat. Depending on the fashion, more or less successful attempts were made to breed other fur-bearing animals (raccoon, muskrat, skunk, among others). Most fur animal skins come from fur farms. For reasons of animal welfare, the breeding of fur animals is prohibited in Austria, Switzerland and Great Britain.
Fur hunting and trade
Already since the 16th and 17th century, laws for the protection of various hunting animals were passed in several countries, in which certain closed seasons were specified. Since the middle of the 19th century, there have been additional efforts to preserve wildlife, which have found expression in various laws. Most notable was the North Pacific Fur Seal Convention in 1911 to protect the northern fur seal and sea otter. In 1973, the Washington Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, internationally known as CITES, was adopted and ratified by the Federal Republic of Germany in 1976. It restricts and regulates trade in wild animals and plants. Additional restrictions are imposed by the Federal Species Protection Ordinance, which came into force on 1 January 1987.
Some fur-bearing animals, such as muskrat and mink, have established themselves as neozoa in the European wild, partially displacing endogenous species such as the European mink. Captive escapes from fur farming or deliberate releases are controversial. Conservation measures include international trade agreements restricting the fur trade, as well as shooting quotas, protected areas and closed seasons for individual species. The World Wildlife Fund accepts traditional fur trapping under well-defined conditions. This hunting management as well as the management of individual wild fur-bearing species is controversial, for example in seal hunting and muskrat control. NABU-Germany accepts the utilization of the furs resulting from population-adapted fox hunting in Germany. At the latest since the Washington Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species came into force in 1973, almost all spotted cats (South American wild cats, ocelots, all big cats) and otters are no longer legally traded. This is without prejudice to the free and unrestricted trade and import of smoked products, furs and fur garments in the EU.
Fur farming
The keeping of fur animals is researched as an aspect of agriculture, zoology as well as veterinary science, the scientific monitoring of hunting and keeping of wild animals is a matter of vegetation biology as well as forestry. Knud Erik Heller of the University of Copenhagen advocates, on the basis of studies of the stress levels of fur-bearing animals, for example, a concealed retreat for caged mink, the cage size as such having little influence. The wearing properties, such as the ability to keep warm and temperature regulation with and in furs, are of great interest for behavioural research, as in the manufacture of appropriate clothing.
In most states, the keeping of fur animals falls under the general regulations on breeding as well as on the slaughter or killing of animals. Under section 4(1) of the Animal Welfare Act 1972, vertebrate animals "may be killed only under stunning or otherwise, so far as is reasonable in the circumstances, only by avoiding pain". The performance of the killing is made dependent on appropriate knowledge and skills and is followed up within the training of fur farmers by recommendations for the killing of fur animals on farms in a manner appropriate to the welfare of the animals. Wild-caught animals are subject, inter alia, to the Trapping Regulation. Cross-border trade is regulated by the international Washington Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species.
At European level, the import or export of cat and dog fur to or from EU countries was banned with effect from 31 December 2008; cat fur was used in particular to relieve rheumatic pain. The reason given for the ban is the lack of acceptance of the use of these emotionally salient pets. National regulations are in place in countries such as Switzerland and the UK, where fur farms have been banned since the early 1990s. Commercial use is no longer profitable, as costly enclosure husbandry is prescribed for these wild animals. In Austria, the Ordinance on the Keeping of Fur Animals has banned fur farming for commercial purposes since 1998. A European ban failed because of the attitude of the Scandinavians, especially Finland and Denmark, where fur farming is an important regional economic factor.
Origin labels
Since 2008, the International Fur Trade Federation, an association of fur traders, has been organising labelling of furs with the "Origin Assured" mark. Such a label is supposed to indicate that the goods come from certain animal species and from certain countries where "regulations or standards" exist for the production of the furs. For the species for which the label is issued, a distinction is sometimes made between countries of origin and wild and farmed animals, but not between farms or companies. Since 2003, there has also been a label propagated by fur producers, which is supposed to indicate that the furs are "European" (citation: German Fur Institute) furs, indicating the animal species.