The Frankfurt National Assembly initially had only one clear task: according to the Federal Election Law, it was to draft a constitution for the whole of Germany and agree it with the governments. However, when the National Assembly took office, the question arose as to the continued existence of the Bundestag and the establishment of a federal executive. The war against Denmark and other problems indicated a need for action. Thus, the National Assembly also took decisions outside its original task, serving as a parliament in an imperial legislature and cooperating with the central power it established.
Central power
→ Main article: Provisional Central Power
After lengthy deliberations on a federal executive, i.e., a government for the federal or imperial level, the National Assembly passed the Imperial Act on the Introduction of a Provisional Central Power for Germany on June 28, 1848. The provisional constitutional order for Germany provided for an imperial administrator, a kind of substitute monarch, who appointed ministers. For itself, the National Assembly defined the following role in the Central Power Act:
- She elected the Reichsverweser
- The ministers were responsible to her, the overall Reich Ministry
- Ministers had to provide her with information on request
- It decided together with the central power on war and peace and treaties with foreign powers
On 29 June, the National Assembly elected Archduke Johann of Austria as Reichsverweser. He appointed the Leiningen cabinet in July and August and later also other cabinets. Although it was not expressly stipulated that a minister had to resign at the request of the National Assembly, de facto this was the case, partly because the National Assembly represented the most important political backing for the government. A parliamentary mode of government thus prevailed. However, the National Assembly did not have the power to dismiss the Reichsverweser Johann, even if the Stuttgart rump parliament later declared his actions unlawful.
Reichsgesetzgebung
→ Main article: Imperial legislation 1848/1849
The results of the work of MPs include a number of laws and ordinances on various subjects. Some of them deal directly with the activity or status of the deputies, such as the Imperial Act on the Procedure in the Case of Judicial Accusations against Members of the Constituent Imperial Assembly of 30 September 1848. Others relate to the central power, while still others had the purpose, not least, of demonstrating the usefulness of the National Assembly as a lawmaker establishing order and unity by means of rather uncontroversial regulations, above all the General German Bill of Exchange Ordinance of 24 November 1848.
The deputies considered the fundamental rights of the German people to be particularly important; these were actually part of the future constitution, but had already been passed as an imperial law on 20 December 1848. The catalogue of fundamental rights established individual liberties of the Germans, but also, for example, institutional guarantees regarding the administration of justice, and it prohibited punishments such as the pillory and largely the death penalty. Because of the abolition of noble privileges, the catalogue of fundamental rights was naturally not welcomed by absolutely all Germans.
Laws were passed by the National Assembly and then signed by the Reichsverweser and the relevant minister, to be published in the Reichsgesetzblatt. The basis for this procedure was the Imperial Law Concerning the Promulgation of Imperial Laws and the Decrees of the Provisional Central Power of 27 September 1848. No law, but an early resolution of the National Assembly of 14 June 1848 comparable to it, led to the creation of a German Imperial Fleet.
A publication of the Imperial laws in the corresponding law gazettes of the individual states was not necessary for the validity of the Imperial laws. Similar to the central power and the imperial constitution, it was again the small states that recognized imperial legislation in principle, while the middle states and great powers balked. Despite the Federal Reaction Decree of 1851, which combated imperial legislation and its consequences in the state legislatures, the legal legacy of the National Assembly lived on and was partially incorporated into the legislation of the North German Confederation.
Constitutional
→ Main article: Frankfurt Imperial Constitution
Especially after the difficulties in the summer and autumn of 1848 in gaining recognition for the emerging German Empire and its central power, the deputies concentrated on constitutional work. In doing so, they had to take into account the political situation in Germany, especially the dualism of Austria and Prussia, as well as considerable differences of opinion that also existed within the National Assembly. In particular, the territory of the empire and the head of the empire were disputed.
At the beginning, the deputies assumed with the utmost naturalness that the previous federal territory should essentially become the territory of the Reich and that the corresponding part of Austria belonged to it. Austria, however, made it abundantly clear, at the latest at the beginning of March 1849, that it wanted to belong to a German state organization only with all its territories (including Hungary and Northern Italy) and rejected a national parliament. Germany was to be a Greater Austrian confederation. Prussia, on the other hand, sent cautiously positive signals about a German unification. This situation led to the constitution listing the members of the empire along with Austria, but speaking of the possibility of Austria joining the empire at a later date. Similarly, the affiliation of Schleswig to the Reich was reserved for a later settlement.
The majority of the deputies favoured a single person as head of the empire, and that a monarch. The republicans were generally in the minority, but for some time there was still the idea of placing a multi-headed body at the head of the Empire. Votes in March 1849 then led to the decision that the National Assembly would elect one of the German princes as emperor, whose crown would subsequently be hereditary (hereditary imperial solution). The National Assembly also elected the Prussian King Frederick William IV as Emperor at the end of March.
Linked to this was the question of the emperor's power, which was also not decided until March. The right-wing and the centre-right advocated an absolute veto by the emperor, i.e. laws of the Reichstag could only come into force with his approval. The more left-wing deputies wanted only a suspensive veto: the emperor's objection would only have postponed the entry into force of a law. The latter view prevailed through voting arrangements, because some left-wing votes were needed for the solution without Austria (Pact Simon-Gagern).
Contrary to the intent of the Federal Election Act of 1848, the deputies proclaimed the constitution on their own authority, without agreement with the state governments. According to the Central Powers Act, the coming into being of the Constitution was also not a task for the central powers. Thus, the Constitution came into force as soon as it was promulgated on 28 March 1849, signed by the President of the National Assembly Eduard Simson and the other deputies. Today's literature is divided on the validity; some authors affirm it, others deny it, others mediately say, for example, that it has not acquired legal force.
Ultimately, it was a political decision at the time whether to recognize it or not. Subsequently, 28 governments, under pressure the King of Württemberg and furthermore the revolutionary regimes in Saxony and the Palatinate recognized the constitution. The fickle King Frederick William IV of Prussia, however, rejected it as well as the imperial crown (finally on 28 April) and, together with other monarchs, put down the revolution.
The Frankfurt Imperial Election Law of 12 April 1849 is in itself a simple Imperial law, although it does materially belong to the Reichstag and thus to an organ of the Imperial Constitution. It was also for practical reasons that the Constitutional Committee removed it from the Constitution. The committee itself had initially proposed an unequal suffrage law that would have again excluded many National Assembly voters from voting. Partly because the Kleindeutsch-erbkaiserliche Partei needed the votes of left-wing deputies, equal and universal male suffrage prevailed for the Reichswahlgesetz. More precisely, the law regulated the elections to the People's House of the Reichstag, but this election did not take place because of the suppression of the revolution.