Initial situation
Initially, the McDonnell F-4 Phantom was not equipped with an on-board gun, as it was assumed that in future air combat would only be fought at long range with guided missiles. During the Vietnam War it became apparent that the United States Air Force's (USAF) focus on this tactic was too optimistic. The rules of engagement in force there, together with the low hit rate of the AIM-7D/E Sparrow (7%) and AIM-9 Sidewinder (15%) air-to-air missiles, often led to precarious situations in air combat when North Vietnamese aircraft were in the sights of the F-4 pilots but could not be shot down because the range was too short.
In order to better estimate the cornering capability of a fighter aircraft, Colonel John Boyd developed the Energy Maneuverability Theory together with the mathematician Thomas Christie at the beginning of 1960. With its help, the maneuverability of a combat aircraft is determined on the basis of the specific power surplus. Parameters such as short turn rate, sustained turn rate, climb rate, acceleration and deceleration are used to assess the aeronautical performance of a fighter aircraft. This knowledge led to the Lightweight Fighter program, which resulted in the F-16 Fighting Falcon and F/A-18 Hornet.
These developments did not go unnoticed in the Soviet Union, so around 1970 the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (ZAGI) was tasked with developing the aerodynamics of a new fighter aircraft. For cost reasons, the original Perspektivni Frontovoi Istrebitel (PFI) design was split: Into a lighter LPFI for Mikoyan-Gurevich and a heavier TPFI by Sukhoi. The MiG-29 first entered the air forces of the Soviet Union in 1984. Although the aircraft can carry only a small weapons load, its wing loading and thrust-to-weight ratio are unspectacular, and as a point defense fighter it can carry relatively little fuel, the new MiG posed a serious threat to NATO aircraft. In addition to the higher specific power surplus, the sophisticated aerodynamics made it possible to achieve high maneuverability even without fly-by-wire technology, without electronic control. The U.S. increased the maximum load multiple of its fighters in the Lightweight Fighter Program to 9g, but the MiG-29 could be loaded to a load limit of about 10g. Serial production of the larger Su-27 began somewhat later. Although both aircraft were based on the same ZAGI design, their roles were different: The heavy Su-27 was intended to penetrate deep into NATO territory and was equipped for this purpose with large internal fuel tanks, twelve external load stations for weapons and a tail radar. Full maneuverability was achieved only with 60% internal fuel capacity, then the Su-27 can reach the maximum angle of attack and the highest load multiple of 9 g in a dogfight.
To compensate for the poor hit rate of air-to-air missiles, the salvo tactic was introduced: This involves firing two guided missiles at each air target at close intervals. To increase the hit rate, one guided missile is combined with semi-active radar guidance and one with infrared seeker. Air-to-air missiles with passive radar seekers have been introduced to counter electronic warfare fighters and AWACS. Since salvo tactics could not be used in close combat, the Soviet Union developed the Wympel R-73, an infrared-guided short-range air-to-air missile that was clearly superior to its Western counterpart of the time in all parameters. Another new feature was the Schlem helmet-mounted sight, which allowed the guided missile to be directed at targets up to 45° off the flight axis without the pilot having to get the enemy aircraft in the head-up display.
European cooperation
In 1971, the UK was engaged in the development of a successor to the F-4 Phantom to counter the Soviet threat. The AST 403 requirements, published in 1972, resulted in a conventional P.96 design in the late 1970s, but the design was dropped because of its similarity to the F/A-18 Hornet. Since the procurement of the American F-4 Phantom resulted in the loss of thousands of jobs in the British aerospace industry, the next fighter aircraft had to be an in-house development again for political reasons. Consequently, discussions began with Tornado partner countries Germany and Italy, as well as France, with whom the SEPECAT Jaguar had already been developed. The discussion was controversial. Although agreement was quickly reached on a delta-canard fighter, the priorities of this design, known as the European Combat Aircraft (ECA), differed fundamentally: while Britain sought an air superiority fighter with robust air-to-ground capabilities, France placed more emphasis on ground attack capabilities, with air-to-air missions as a secondary role. The most demanding requirements were set by Germany and could only be met by MBB's TKF-90 (Tactical Combat Aircraft 90) design: High acceleration at all altitudes, good supersonic maneuverability in the early stages of air combat, effective fire-and-forget air-to-air armament for medium ranges, extreme maneuverability in dogfights, and good range for aerial surveillance missions and escorts. Turn combat capability was to be achieved through high pitch rates and maintenance of flight stability even after a stall. Thrust vector control was to give the aircraft the ability to adjust its line of sight to the target. Ground attack capabilities were only intended as a secondary capability. After no agreement was reached on the ECA in 1981 and Germany lacked the money to develop the TKF-90 in-house, the following options were investigated at the Federal Ministry of Defense: First, a low-cost solution, such as the development of a Tornado variant or a small fighter with only one engine. Alternatively, the procurement of F/A-18 Hornets was discussed, but this was viewed sceptically by industry and politicians. A participation in the Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) of the USAF was also discussed. The German aerospace companies MBB and Dornier had already designed their own Eurofighter models, but also participated in other, including American, designs. At the time, German Defense Minister Manfred Wörner threatened a German-American solution if French involvement was not possible. While cooperation seemed possible on an industrial and military basis, and the timetables of Germany and the United States correlated well, the cost of the ATF was expected to at least match, if not exceed, that of the ECA, which also buried this option.
To resolve the stalemate, British Aerospace instead joined Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm's Tactical Combat Fighter 90 (TKF-90) design. Both published a proposal called the European Collaborative Fighter or European Combat Fighter, while France continued to rely on an in-house development. Eventually Aeritalia also joined the design, and so in April 1982 the Panavia partner companies launched the Agile Combat Aircraft (ACA) program, which later led to the Experimental Aircraft Program (EAP). In 1983, the final attempt to bring together the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Italy, began in the cooperative program known as the Future European Fighter Aircraft (FEFA). France insisted on an aircraft carrier version, 50 percent of the work share, and system leadership from Dassault. The aircraft was to be lighter and simpler, as Dassault expected better export opportunities. These demands were unacceptable for the other manufacturing states and incompatible with their own requirements. Because of these completely different performance requirements of the French, the other states withdrew from the program in 1984. On August 1, 1985, Great Britain, Germany and Italy agreed to build the European Fighter Aircraft (EFA). In September, Spain also joined in, as this was seen as a strategic decision and was expected to have industrial advantages.
Start of development
To manage the project, Eurofighter Jagdflugzeug GmbH was founded in Munich in 1986. The development and cost shares were split 33% DASA (Germany) and BAE Systems (Great Britain) and 21% Alenia Aeronautica (Italy) and 13% CASA (Spain). At the time the development contracts were signed, the four partner states intended to procure 765 aircraft - 250 each for Germany and Great Britain, 165 for Italy and 100 for Spain. In August 1986, under the umbrella of the NATO Eurofighter and Tornado Management Agency (NETMA), Eurojet Turbo GmbH was founded in Hallbergmoos, northeast of Munich, for the development, production, maintenance, service and export of the future Eurofighter's EJ200 engines, with Rolls-Royce (UK), MTU Aero Engines (Germany), ITP (Spain) and Fiat Avio [now Avio Aero] (Italy) as shareholders.
Already in 1983 the German Martin Friemer of MBB was appointed Technical Director of the Eurofighter project, he already worked with the British on the Tornado project. Gerry Willox of British Aerospace became Managing Director. Already on 26 May 1983 BAe and Italian and German companies agreed to build a demonstrator. The first flight of the resulting British Aerospace EAP took place in 1986 and laid the technological foundation for the Eurofighter project. The EAP tested many new technologies that were later used in the Eurofighter. For example, the wings were made entirely of carbon fibre reinforced plastic and glued together from individual parts. The EAP tested the suitability of lightweight materials such as CFRP and Al-Li alloys for sustained supersonic flight and new, low-cost manufacturing processes for titanium and CFRP semi-finished products and individual parts. The aerodynamic instability and thus the manoeuvrability of the aircraft could be further increased and the control logic implemented as software in the flight control computers. Like the Eurofighter, the EAP possessed the ability to override in order to exceed the standard G-limit. Load measurements on the EAP made it possible to estimate the structural load for the EFA much better, which allowed a lighter design. Aerodynamics were tested as well as the air intake. A modern cockpit and avionics architecture based on the USAF's Pave Pillar concept were implemented. The cost of the EAP was partly borne by industry, with the UK contributing £80 million. Since the Federal Republic of Germany did not participate in the financing, only one aircraft could be built.
Rockwell and Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm conducted self-financed studies on thrust vector technology from 1981 to 1984. MBB presented the concept to the German Air Force in 1983. The Air Force decided not to include the technology in the EFA because of its technical immaturity. In return, the governments of Germany and the USA signed a contract in May 1986 for the construction of two experimental aircraft based on the TKF-90, the Rockwell-MBB X-31 Enhanced Fighter Maneuverability (EFM). The first flight took place on 11 October 1990. Starting in August 1993, simulated air combat missions were flown against various fighter aircraft. In the following test series, which was funded by the JAST program, the usefulness of thrust vector control in air-to-ground operations was tested. It was also investigated to what extent thrust vector control could replace the vertical stabilizer. In the subsequent VECTOR program, automatic landings were flown at angles of attack of up to 24° to reduce the landing distance required. In addition to controlled steering after a stall, the EFM program also tested avionics such as the Helmet-Mounted Visual and Audio Display System (HMVAD). This was able to display information not only graphically on the helmet display, but also through a 3D audio system. Furthermore, augmented reality was tested by flying dogfights against a virtual fighter aircraft. Efforts were made, together with Spain, to incorporate the Eurojet EJ200 engine with thrust vector control into the X-31 experimental aircraft to pave the way for the Eurofighter. However, for various reasons this did not materialise.
At the same time, the USAF's requirements for the Advanced Tactical Fighter changed fundamentally: a few months before the demonstration and validation phase in 1985, the USAF changed the original Request for Information (RFI) in favor of higher stealth requirements. Albert C. Piccirillo, head of the ATF program feared that the USAF could not justify procurement of the ATF unless stealth technology was used as in the F-117 and B-2 programs. Companies such as Lockheed, which was competing with a Delta-Canard fighter with a wedge-shaped belly inlet and four semi-stealthy air-to-air missiles, were therefore forced to completely revise their designs.
The Soviet Union also started the development of a new fighter aircraft with the Eleventh Five-Year Plan. In 1983, Mikoyan-Gurevich was tasked with the MFI project, which was based on the EFA and ATF. France, in the meantime, built an airworthy demonstrator, which was named Rafale A and made its maiden flight on July 4, 1986, at the Istres Air Force Base. At the same time, the development of the MICA was started in order to adopt the Soviet salvo tactics with seeker mix. In the late 1980s, a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on future air-to-air guided weapons was signed in NATO. In it, the U.S. and European countries agreed to develop the longer-range infrared-guided ASRAAM, compared to the AIM-9, to complement the active radar-guided AMRAAM.
End of the Cold War
With the end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, the Eurofighter project came into crisis in 1992. In view of the expected high costs of German reunification, the German government under Helmut Kohl promised to pull out of the project. The German Defence Minister at the time, Volker Rühe, now promoted a cheaper aircraft to be built based on Eurofighter technology, dubbed the "EFA-light" or "Jäger 90". Seven studies examined various configurations. Five of these would have been more expensive to redesign. The two single-engine configurations would have been cheaper, but had no better performance than the potentially adversarial Su-27 Flanker and MiG-29 Fulcrum aircraft. None of the configurations studied could match the combat capability of the revised Eurofighter designated as the New EFA (NEFA). As an alternative, the procurement of the French Dassault Rafale was considered by the German side. The political considerations were not shared by the Air Force. The Air Force Inspector at the time, Jörg Kuebart, said that the only alternative to the EFA was fewer EFAs.
The procurement of an alternative fighter aircraft was also being considered in the UK. However, a good price-performance ratio with high performance was required. In the process, a possible procurement of the YF-22 under development was also discussed. Therefore, British Aerospace and the Defence Research Agency (DRA) were commissioned to conduct a performance study to evaluate the combat capability of various modern fighter aircraft. Only air combat beyond the pilot's line of sight was examined, as this is where the YF-22's stealth and supercruise advantages are greatest. The comparison was based on known data on these aircraft; a modified Su-27 Flanker (comparable to the Su-35 Super Flanker) was assumed to be the opposing aircraft. The study concluded that the Eurofighter would win about 80% of all dogfights, while the chances of a YF-22 would be about 90%. As the cost of the YF-22 was estimated to be 60-100% higher than that of the EFA, Jonathan Aitken, the Minister of State responsible for defence procurement - who had previously opposed the EFA - concluded that the Eurofighter was the most cost-effective solution. The procurement of the Eurofighter was then pursued by the British side.
Meanwhile, Italy was on the verge of financial collapse and, like the German government, wanted out of the Eurofighter program. However, a diplomatic intervention by the British government led to a change of mood again, leaving Germany politically isolated. Since Germany would have had to compensate the other countries financially if it pulled out, German Defense Minister Volker Rühe and his British counterpart Malcolm Rifkind agreed to continue the project at the 1992 NATO meeting in Gleneagles. While the EFA with an empty mass of 9750 kg was supposed to carry a weapon load of 6500 kg, the requirements were adjusted in a revision of the contracts in 1992. For the new EFA, the airframe life was doubled from 3000 hours to 6000 hours and the weapons load was increased from 6500 kg to 7500 kg, increasing the empty mass of the aircraft from 9750 kg to 11,000 kg. Presumably it was also agreed to throttle the EJ200 engines in peacetime to 60 kN dry and 90 kN wet to double their life as well. The EFA/Fighter 90 project was then renamed "Eurofighter 2000". Germany wanted to integrate the AN/APG-65 for cost reasons and to do without the self-protection system, Great Britain did not want to install an on-board gun. In the end, these special requests were also abandoned, so that the new EFA corresponded to the old EFA, except for the change in masses and service life. Martin Friemer (MBB, Technical Director of the Eurofighter project) described the behaviour of the German government in retrospect as unhelpful. Independent defence analyst Paul Beaver believes that all attempts by German Defence Minister Volker Rühe to make the aircraft cheaper were never substantiated by facts and estimates that the cost of Eurofighter has been increased by 40-50% due to the delays and redesign.
After the continuation of the project seemed assured, Rühe wanted to reduce the number of German orders to 140 aircraft, but leave the German work share in the project unchanged at 33%. After a further marathon of negotiations, it was possible to agree on 232 aircraft for Great Britain, 180 for Germany, 121 for Italy and 87 for Spain when the final production contract was signed in 1997. The share of work was redistributed between British Aerospace (37.42%), DASA (29.03%), Aeritalia (19.52%) and CASA (14.03%). The UK now took the lead position in the project and the aircraft was renamed Eurofighter Typhoon.
Delivery and further development
During the political negotiations, the development of the Eurofighter was further advanced by industry and the military, and the year 2002 was targeted as the delivery date. On 27 March 1994, the first prototype DA1 took off for its maiden flight in Germany. The flights of the prototypes DA1 and DA2 still took place with the RB199 engines of the Tornado fighter, because the Eurojet EJ200 engine was not yet operational. On June 4, 1995, DA3 took off from Caselle near Turin for a maiden flight with the new Eurojet EJ200 engine, and in March 1997 the two-seater version flew for the first time in Great Britain. On 21 November 2002, during the 323rd test flight with pre-production engines, the prototype DA6 crashed about 100 kilometres south of Madrid. When the afterburners were ignited, the thrust nozzles of both engines were not yet fully open, and the resulting backpressure caused a flameout. Due to the resulting failure of the hydraulics, the aircraft was no longer controllable and crashed. It was completely destroyed, the two-man crew was able to save themselves with the ejection seats. In 2002, it was foreseeable that the targeted date for delivery of the first production aircraft could not be met, nor was it foreseeable at the end of the year when this would be the case. In addition, a total of 1400 components were changed between 2000 and 2002. In the cockpit, for example, the CRTs were replaced by liquid crystal displays, a g/AoA override switch was installed to enable higher angles of attack, load multiples and speeds to be flown, and a panic button was integrated which aligns the aircraft with the horizon in the event of loss of orientation and places it in a gentle climb. The possibility of dropping active radar jammers - specifically the Texas Instruments GEN-X was evaluated - via the dispensers was dropped.
In 1994, the UK began the Future Offensive Air System (FOAS) studies, which were intended to produce a successor to the Panavia Tornado. In the course of the studies it was determined that a mix of manned combat aircraft, combat drones (UCAV) and cruise missiles would be the best solution. European cooperation was sought and realized with France. Germany showed interest in joining. France later dropped out of the project, which was subsequently terminated in 2005. A variant of the Eurofighter was considered by the British as the main platform for FOAS, so that in the future findings from the FOAS studies such as a synthetic cockpit, more powerful engines for Mach 2 cruise, conformal fuel tanks, "signature control", weapons bay, voice control of drones, energy weapons and powerful data links will be incorporated into the Eurofighter project.
In 1999, DA4 and DA5 flew for the first time with the production version of the CAPTOR radar, and software development of the sensors began. For this purpose, the radar was installed in a One-Eleven, which was used as a (O-Ton) "hack" aircraft. Close combat modes involving aircraft dynamics were tested with the DAs. The hack flights of PIRATE with a Dassault Falcon were supposed to take place at the end of 1999, but were postponed to 2001. In this year the DASS and Link 16 were also available, so that by 2004 the sensor fusion could be programmed.
On 13 June 2003, the first series-produced Eurofighter was finally presented to the public. The Bundeswehr took delivery of the aircraft on 4 August 2003. The official introduction of the aircraft into the German Air Force took place on April 30, 2004, when seven two-seater Eurofighters entered service as a training squadron at Fighter Wing 73 "Steinhoff" in Laage. In February 2005, the first operational tests in cold weather zones took place in Sweden, followed by heat tests in Morón de la Frontera, Spain, the following summer. At the same time, construction of the simulators began at the German sites in Laage, Neuburg and Nörvenich as well as in the other Eurofighter user countries. These will be used to train and retrain pilots on the Eurofighter and to develop and test operational tactics and scenarios. Since air combat with guided weapons cannot be trained, simulators are the only way to do so. By networking cockpit and mission simulators, it is also possible to practise missions with several participants in a formation or against each other.
In part because technologies or funding were not available, weapons systems were integrated, the flight envelope expanded and full avionics scaffolded in subsequent years. For example, the full Praetorian Self-Defence System (DASS) is only available from Tranche 1 Block 2B and the first PIRATE sensor was delivered to Aeronautica Militare on 2 August 2007 in a Tranche 1 Block 5 aircraft. The Helmet Mounted Symbology System (HMSS) has only been available since January 2011. The first Combat Enhancement Phase 1 Enhancement (P1E) was carried out in late 2013 for Tranche 2 aircraft.
Stakes
In addition to air surveillance missions, such as escorting Russian bombers over the North Sea and Atlantic Ocean, British Typhoons had their first combat mission on 21 March 2011 during military operations in Libya in 2011. 24 Typhoons from No. XI Squadron were deployed to the Italian airbase of Gioia del Colle in "Operation Ellamy". Within the first 24 hours of arrival, Eurofighters began enforcing the no-fly zone over Libya. From 31 March to 6 April, Eurofighters were flown in a configuration of four each short-range AIM-132 ASRAAM air-to-air missiles and four longer-range AIM-120 AMRAAM air-to-air missiles, after which fewer air-to-air weapons were carried in favour of target illumination pods and two to six GBU-16/48 (Guided Bomb Unit) laser-guided bombs. On the first day a four-man flock was used to hunt enemy helicopters by means of EuroRADAR CAPTOR, which "jumped", i.e. landed every 15 to 20 minutes to avoid radar detection. Shoot-downs could not be achieved. Enemy fighter aircraft were not detected during the entire operation.
Ground operations began on 31 March 2011. The Typhoons attacked targets both as pure Eurofighter squadrons and in mixed formations together with Tornados. In the mixed formations, either the target reconnaissance was carried out by the Eurofighters and the attack by the Tornados, or vice versa, using hunter-killer tactics. In some cases, pilots flew with a tablet computer on their thighs to compare images of the target area. The generation of sonic booms by the Eurofighters - which happened quite frequently - was also seen as useful to show presence. The cooperation with the Tornados increased their combat value, as they do not have a multifunctional information distribution system (MIDS). Through this system, all friendly units as well as their call signs are displayed. In the case of aircraft, the system also shows the type, altitude, heading and fuel level of other aircraft involved in the mission. In the case of ships, the type and name are also displayed in addition to the position. If a JSTARS or ASTOR is in range, detected ground targets are also displayed in real time. Since the Tornados did not have this system, the data was sent to the Eurofighters, which passed the information on to the Tornados via voice radio and carried out the mission together as a squadron. These were sometimes quite complex; on one mission 14 bombs were in the air at the same time to hit the target area simultaneously. In total, over 400 bombs were dropped by the Eurofighters.
The main threat was the enemy air defense in the form of anti-aircraft guns (Flak) and shoulder-launched one-man surface-to-air missiles (MANPADS), which, however, could be flown over every time without taking damage. The flak fire was without consequence. The longest mission lasted 8 hours and 45 minutes and required five air refuelings. Three were originally planned to supply the Typhoons shuttling back and forth between the eastern and western borders on the north coast. The average mission time was six hours. The feared information overload failed to materialize; only taking mission orders and entering them into the computer while in contact with a tanker proved challenging. In a total of 600 missions, 3000 flight hours were flown. Within 24 hours of the end of the mission, the aircraft were redeployed.
In February 2015, Saudi Air Force Eurofighters attacked IS targets with Paveway 4 bombs for the first time.
On 3 December 2015, British Typhoon aircraft were deployed to Akrotiri airbase in Cyprus as part of Operation Inherent Resolve. The very next evening, Eurofighters accompanied by Panavia Tornados attacked IS targets in Syria.