The word energy goes back to ancient Greek ἐνέργεια, energeia, which in ancient Greece had a purely philosophical meaning in the sense of "living reality and efficacy" (see also "act and potency"). As a scientific term, the word itself was not introduced into mechanics until 1807 by the physicist Thomas Young. The new quantity energy was intended to indicate the strength of quite specific effects which a moving body can produce by its motion, and which cannot be determined solely by its momentum
("mass times velocity"). About the impulse it was known since the investigations of the collision of two bodies by Christiaan Huygens, Christopher Wren and John Wallis around the year 1668, that it is preserved for elastic as well as for inelastic bodies, i.e. that it is the correct measure for the caused changes and thus for the indestructible "magnitude of motion". In other processes, however, bodies of different masses, even if they have the same momentum, cause effects of different magnitudes. These include, for example, the height that a body reaches in upward motion, or the depth of the hole that it makes in a soft mass on impact. Here the effect does not increase proportionally with velocity, as does momentum, but with the square of the velocity. Hence in 1686 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz called the quantity
the true measure of the magnitude of motion and called it vis viva ("living force"). This name followed the usage of the time, in which a body could cause effects only by the forces inherent in it. However, the name living force, by "confusion with Newton's concept of force, has produced an unholy confusion of ideas and an innumerable host of misunderstandings" (according to Max Planck in 1887 in his prize-winning account of the history of the law of conservation of energy). Leibniz argued as follows:
Lifting a weight of
to the height
requires as much work as lifting a weight
to the height
(law of leverage). According to Galileo Galilei, in free fall
, so the terminal velocity in the first case is twice that in the second case. If one sets for the intrinsic (living) force
with which one wants to measure this work (latent form of the living force), then with conservation of the living force
, that is,
and not
as the followers of Descartes thought.
The correct prefactor
in the kinetic energy was already derived by Daniel Bernoulli in 1726. With him as with other analytical mechanics of the 18th century such as Leonhard Euler (e.g. treatment of elastic deformation), Joseph Louis Lagrange (Mécanique Analytique 1788) can also be found precursors of the concept of potential energy (the term potential function originates from George Green 1828 and independently it was introduced by Carl Friedrich Gauss 1840, but as potential it was already known to Lagrange and Laplace). The concept was already known to Leibniz (in his derivation of
) and Johann I Bernoulli, who was the first to formulate the principle of conservation of living forces in 1735 (but Leibniz also had the idea, for example, in the 5th letter to Samuel Clarke), which was disseminated in particular by Leibniz's student Christian Wolff. At that time, one spoke of potential energy as the latent form of the living force, which is distributed to smaller particles of the body, for example, in the case of inelastic impact.
In order to predict the above effects of the motion of the body, Young defined the quantity energy as the ability of the body to travel a certain distance against a resisting force. He also noted that work done on a body in the form of lifting work is later found quantitatively in its energy, but did not yet arrive at the notion of conversion of different forms of energy and also retained Leibniz's formula
and was by and large still a follower of the Cartesian view of forces.
In the 18th century, mechanics and physics were not particularly interested in energy; important researchers such as Euler saw the dispute over the vis viva, the true measure of force, as a matter for the philosophers, and they were concerned with solving the equations of motion primarily in celestial mechanics. The concept of energy in the modern sense found its origin not with the analytical mechanics of the 18th century, but with the applied mathematicians of the French school, including Lazare Carnot, who wrote that living force can manifest itself either as
or force times displacement (as latent living force). A quantitative definition of work ("force times displacement", or
) was also given simultaneously by Coriolis and Poncelet in 1829, apparently independently and also by Young. Coriolis also found the correct expression
for the kinetic energy, which was first called kinetic energy by Rankine in 1853.
In connection with the steam engine, the idea developed that heat energy is the cause of a moving energy, or mechanical work, in many processes. The starting point was that water is converted to a gaseous state by heat and the gas expansion is used to move a piston in a cylinder. The force motion of the piston reduces the stored heat energy of the water vapor. The relationship between mechanical energy and heat was demonstrated in famous experiments by Benjamin Thompson (Count Rumford, Munich 1796, 1798) and Humphry Davy (1799).
The physicist Nicolas Carnot realized that a change in the volume of steam is necessary when performing mechanical work. He also discovered that the cooling of the hot water in the steam engine does not only occur through heat conduction. Carnot published these findings in 1824 in a highly regarded paper on the operating principle of the steam engine. In 1834, Émile Clapeyron put Carnot's findings into mathematical form and developed the graphical representation of the Carnot cycle still used today.
In 1841, the German physician Julius Robert Mayer published his idea that energy can neither be created nor destroyed, but only transformed. He wrote to a friend, "My contention is ...: Falling force, motion, heat, light, electricity, and chemical difference of ponderabilia are one and the same object in different manifestations." The amount of heat lost in a steam engine would be exactly equal to the mechanical work done by the engine. This is known today as "conservation of energy," or the "first law of thermodynamics."
In 1854, the physicist Rudolf Clausius improved the ideas about energy conversion. He showed that only part of the heat energy can be converted into mechanical work. A body in which the temperature remains constant cannot perform any mechanical work. Clausius developed the second law of thermodynamics and introduced the concept of entropy. According to the second law, it is impossible for heat to independently transfer from a colder to a warmer body.
In 1847, Hermann von Helmholtz formulated the principle "on the conservation of force" and the impossibility of a perpetuum mobiles (perpetuus, lat. eternal; mobilis, lat.: movable) of the first kind. Many inventors at that time still wanted to produce machines that generated more energy than was put into them. Helmholtz found his insights by working with electrical energy from galvanic elements, especially a zinc/bromine cell. In later years he linked entropy and the heat generated by a chemical conversion to free energy. Both Mayer and Helmholtz had difficulty publishing their findings in the 1840s, however, because both were initially considered outsiders from outside the field and physicists in Germany were on the defensive against the natural philosophy of Schelling's circle, which had been influential since the end of the 18th century, and both were suspected of being followers of this speculative physics.
In 1878, Josiah Gibbs came to similar conclusions as Helmholtz with electrochemical cells. Chemical reactions only take place when the free energy decreases. The free energy can be used to predict whether a chemical transformation is possible at all or how the chemical equilibrium of a reaction behaves when the temperature changes.
After Wilhelm Wien (1900), Max Abraham (1902), and Hendrik Lorentz (1904) had already published considerations on electromagnetic mass, Albert Einstein published in 1905, within the framework of his special theory of relativity, the insight that mass and energy are equivalent.