Changeling (folklore) — mythical child left by fairies, elves, or trolls
A changeling is a child in European folklore believed to be substituted for a human infant by fairies, elves, or trolls. The motif reflects social, medical, and cultural responses to infant illness and difference.
Overview
A changeling is a figure from traditional folklore across many parts of Europe: a child thought to have been secretly left by supernatural beings in place of a human baby. In these stories the human infant is taken away by fairies, elves, or trolls and a changeling — a lookalike, often with unsettling traits — is left with the human parents. The theme appears in diverse languages and cultures, adapting to local beliefs about otherworldly creatures and domestic life.
Image gallery
7 ImagesCommon characteristics
Descriptions of changelings vary, but several repeated features occur in collected accounts. A changeling may be described as unusually pale, sickly, constantly hungry, or slow to develop language and motor skills. Some tales depict them as older and more knowing than a typical infant, while others emphasize behavioral difficulties such as irritability or a malicious temperament. The replacing beings are named differently by region: sometimes trolls, sometimes household spirits or outsiders.
Origins and historical context
Scholars generally view changeling narratives as cultural responses to unexplained infant illness, congenital disability, and infant mortality in pre-modern societies. Before modern medicine, families lacking an explanation for a child’s unusual appearance or developmental delay might interpret the situation through supernatural frameworks. Over time, the stories were shaped by local religion, social norms, and tensions surrounding kinship and maternity.
Folk explanations and remedies
Traditional communities developed various practices intended to expose or reverse a changeling substitution. Reported methods ranged from symbolic tests to dramatic rituals, some aimed at provoking the supernatural return of the human child. Common techniques recorded in regional collections include:
- Performing deliberate shocks or insults to see if the child reveals unnatural age or knowledge.
- Using household items or rites to attract the attention of the original child’s captors.
- Destructive or dangerous actions alleged in some accounts — for example, leaving a child in the wild or heating an oven — intended to force the fairies’ hand; such measures could be fatal and reflect the desperation behind many tales.
These remedies are now read with caution; historians emphasize the social pressures and lack of medical understanding that produced them rather than literal endorsement.
Cultural significance and modern reception
The changeling motif has persisted in literature, art, and popular culture as a metaphor for loss, difference, and anxieties about parenthood. Writers and artists use it to explore themes of identity, alienation, and the boundary between human and otherworldly. Modern reinterpretations often emphasize psychological and social readings rather than supernatural belief.
Variants and notable facts
Different regions have distinctive variants: for example, some Celtic traditions attribute swaps to fairy folk or the sidhe, while Germanic and Scandinavian tales frequently mention elves or elves and fairies. Folklorists caution against equating the stories with single causes; instead, changeling tales combine elements of narrative folklore, explanations for misfortune, and community practices for coping with rare or tragic events.
Christian popular belief and changelings
The oldest literary evidence for the term "changeling" is found in a translation of the Psalms by the Benedictine monk Notker III. (c. 950-1022), where he paraphrases fremediu chint with Old High German wihselinc. From filii alieni Notker makes uuihselinga iudei, obviously meaning children foisted upon them. Consequently, this was a familiar idea in his time. In the St. Paul fragments Notker uses the word wehselkint.
Eike von Repgow (1180/90 to after 1233) mentions in his legal book Sachsenspiegel an altvil, which was explained as a mentally retarded person, probably erroneously as a bisexual person or, according to various derivations, as a changeling. In Middle High German the spellings wehselkint, wihselinc, wechseling, wehsel-balc and wehselkalp occur.
From the 11th century onwards, mental illnesses and physical ailments were increasingly explained by the work of demons as possession. Hildegard von Bingen (1098-1179) regularly attributed the properties of animate nature to devils, druids or witches in her magical and natural medical works. The church adopted pagan ideas and instead of the old demons now had devils and witches appear as antagonists of pious people. The substitution of elves for children was reinterpreted accordingly by church scholars.
The cardinal and crusading preacher Jacob of Vitry (1160/70-1240) warned in one of his sermons against the chamium (middle Latin, probably to cambio, "exchange"), a boy who would suck many nurses and still not grow. Jacob of Vitry wrote sermons for priests who were not so skilled in sermon delivery and recommended that they add a moralizing story at the end for the better understanding of the common people. His story of the changeling (chamium) was not intended as a concluding example, but as a testimony of faith to begin the sermon. The message to be conveyed was clear: the existence of the devil, proven in such a way, was to reinforce the Christian faith. Just as changelings and the devil were supposed to exist according to the testimony (testimonia) of church authorities, other stories contained, for example, the assertion that a half-eaten loaf of bread was not the work of mice but of the devil and that only God could guard against it.
Such sermons had far-reaching effects on medieval popular belief and contributed to making the phenomenon of changelings appear not only as an imagined reality, but also as a tradition going back a long way in history. Further discussion centered on whether changelings were only begotten by demons, or were demons themselves. The latter view was held, among others, by the Heidelberg theologian Nikolaus Magni von Jauer (c. 1355-1435). Thomas Aquinas (c. 1225-1274), in his influential demonological system, coined the belief that a changeling is begotten by the intercourse of an incubus with a woman. According to his theory, the incorporeal devilish spirit can take on a body, but the seed does not come from this body, but from a man with whom the devil had previously performed intercourse in the form of a succubus. As incubus, he transfers this seed, to which he adds his own demonic qualities, to the woman. Thus, the devil "...in the carnal intercourse with men ... first succubus, then incubus, that is, not a real father," because in general demons can occasionally take on a body but have no body of their own and cannot reproduce themselves.
In the early modern period, the Hexenhammer (Malleus maleficiarum), written in 1487 by the Dominican Heinrich Kramer, became the main work legitimising the persecution of witches. Until 1669, 29 editions were published. After the existence of witches had been proven by hair-splitting conclusions and fallacies, relentless action had to be taken against the denial of witchcraft, whereby the numbers of witches killed in Protestant and Catholic areas hardly differed. The work explained witchcraft mainly in terms of the wickedness of female nature and invoked, among other things, the case of the 56-year-old Angéle de la Barthe, who in 1275 had confessed to consorting with the devil every night and had been burned alive for it in Toulouse. She is said to have given birth to a monster with a wolf's head and a snake's tail. In order to feed it, she had to steal small children every night. The case only appears in a 15th century chronicle, but is not mentioned by any contemporary source. For this reason, and because the charge of devil's advocacy does not fit the time given, the account is considered by some historians to be fiction.
In the English-speaking world, the word for changeling appeared in 1555. Initially, it was used to describe children or adults who had been exchanged in some way without the involvement of demons. In another meaning, changeling stood for people whose psychological mood and opinion were constantly changing. In both cases, the word originally had nothing to do with popular belief. Only in a dictionary published in the mid-17th century does a change in meaning show up in the reference "idiot, see changeling." This was the name given to simple-minded women, and secondarily to men, who had no firm faith, and who would be persuaded by any false prophet or impostor. The Anglican bishop Samuel Parker (1640-1687) located the stupidity of a youth called a changeling in his brain function, whereby he was incapable of restraining his passions and appetites. In short, for Parker the changeling became the antithesis of the puritanical man who kept himself under control.
The dissenter Samuel Portage (1633-1691) first brought the devil into play. Religious sects in the 1640s and 1650s referred to mentally retarded or melancholic people as changelings who were possessed by the devil. Portage belonged to the mystical sect of the Behemists (named after their founder Jakob Boehme), who made contact with angels and identified devilish activity in everything inexplicable. For Behemists, the ideal human state on earth was attainable and at the same time the presence of the devil was a reality. In the long epic poem on creation, Mundorum Explicatio, Portage wrote about incubi who placed their seed in ancient witches by magical means. During the Restoration, the devil was a driving force behind the things of nature. Where in the medieval faith he had been under the close watch of God, he now developed a certain active life of his own. The devil made use of witches because he could not produce offspring in a direct way, and created the changelings to bring his devilish nature among men. The questions were generally about how the devil and the spirits did things, not about their basically acknowledged existence.
A rough list of physical characteristics is as follows: Changelings are misshapen, possess congenital abnormalities such as supernumerary fingers, consist only of a body without limbs, are of dwarfish stature, and in most cases are particularly ugly. Changelings have a large misshapen skull, a pale complexion, shaggy hair, fixed or squinting eyes, and are also weak and sickly. If they possessed a large goiter, they were considered to have keel goiter. Symptoms of disease described suggest hydrocephalus (hydrocephalus) or rickets (softening of the bones) caused by vitamin deficiency, which used to be common. Their mental characteristics are described as mentally retarded, little or no speech, lazy, untidy, neglected and restless.

Handling change bellows
There were various magical defenses to prevent the replacement of the baby. For example, the placenta was to be left under the cradle, the child was to be questioned about its true age, or three lights were to be lit in the nursery. A helpful precaution seemed to be to place by or in the cradle a prayer book, a Bible, or a leaf from such a book. A cross or rosary fulfilled the same effect. It was not until the child was baptized that the danger was finally averted. If, however, the devil succeeded in taking possession of unbaptized children, it was no longer possible to redeem them from original sin. It was precisely such children that the devil was after, because he could deny them entrance into the kingdom of heaven. Like the unbaptized deceased children, the children seized by the devil would not join the damned in hell, but they would go to a specially designated forecourt of hell (limbus puerorum), where they would be denied the "vision of God".
If a child was diagnosed as a changeling, Erasmus Francisci recommended in his work Der Höllische Proteus, oder Tausendkünstige Versteller (Nuremberg, 1695):
"It is known that some have thrown the changeling on the dunghill and soon after have their right child again. But whether such a thing would be spoken well of by the authorities to any mother is open to question: because the circumstances often fall very changefully in this case. Therefore, the safest thing to do in such a case is to welcome an understanding theologian, along with a prayerful appeal, for a response."
If a changeling could not be exchanged back, it was usually killed. One attempt to get the rightful child back was to intimidate the changeling by pouring boiling water over him. In 1654, in the Silesian town of Zuckmantel, they burned over a hundred people including infants and children because they were considered creatures of the devil. Martin Luther also wanted to have the changelings killed (homidicidum, "killing of human beings"), because they were only a lump of flesh (massa carnis) without a soul (Table Talk 5207 from 1540). After the Prince of Anhalt had turned down his wish to drown a certain changeling, Luther advised in the same Table Talk No. 5207 to have an Our Father prayed for the child in church. There are still reports from the 19th century of children being mistreated because they were considered to be the devil's bellows.
In a work on paediatrics published in 1472, the physician Bartholomäus Metlinger named the symptoms of a child with an oversized head, which today would be diagnosed as hydrocephalus, as a "changeling". An inexplicable and thus disturbing phenomenon had to have a supernatural cause. The first attempt at a medical explanation for the phenomenon of malformed children was provided a few years earlier, in 1455, by the physician Johannes Hartlieb, who recognised in them not a demonic being but a sick human being and described the physical symptoms as bolism or Latin apetitus caninus ("canine hunger", constant feeling of hunger because the food travels through the body undigested). Hartlieb remained practically alone with this view for a long time. It was not until 1725 that the surgeon and anatomist Lorenz Heister expressed the opinion that a changeling could be a child suffering from rickets. Later, other clinical pictures were mentioned that might have had an influence on changeling conceptions, including cretinism and meningitis.
Questions and answers
Q: What is a changeling?
A: A changeling is a child of a troll, elf, or fairy that has been left in the place of a human child.
Q: How does a changeling look like?
A: A changeling looks like a human baby but is ugly, always hungry, and with a bad temper.
Q: Are changelings more intelligent than human babies?
A: Yes, sometimes changelings are much wiser than a human baby would be.
Q: Where did changeling stories come from?
A: It is thought that changeling stories came from actual events where a family traded their sick child for a healthier, better-looking child.
Q: How might parents know if their child has been replaced with a changeling?
A: Folklore says that parents might be able to figure out that their child has been replaced with a changeling, and if they discovered it quickly enough, they could get their human child back.
Q: What are the ways to get their human child back from a changeling?
A: One way to get the child back was to put the changeling in an oven, and another way was to put the changeling in a forest so that the troll could take its child back.
Q: Was it safe to put the changeling in an oven or a forest?
A: No, sometimes, children died in the oven or forest.
Related articles
Author
AlegsaOnline.com Changeling (folklore) — mythical child left by fairies, elves, or trolls Leandro Alegsa
URL: https://en.alegsaonline.com/art/18551

