Distribution
The distribution range of the blue tit is restricted to the western Palearctic except for two small areas in the north and south of Iran. Europe is widely populated except in the north. There are gaps in its distribution in the high altitudes of the Alps and presumably also in some mountains in the Balkans, although in many places only insufficient data are available for the latter.
The blue tit is absent from Iceland as well as the northern part of Scotland and many of the offshore islands. The Outer Hebrides were not colonized until 1963. In Scandinavia, the distribution is limited to the southern parts of the country and the lowland regions; the high mountain ranges are not populated. The northern limit of the range in Norway is approximately 67° north latitude, in Sweden the closed breeding area in the mixed forests extends to about 61°, in the coastal area in a narrowing strip to 65° north latitude. In Finland, the distribution also extends northwards to about 65° latitude, and in the course of the 20th century the blue tit has expanded its range there considerably to the north. From southern Finland the northern limit of the range extends south-eastwards across Bashkiria to the southern foothills of the Urals. The eastern boundary of the range is complex and probably subject to constant change. It is conceivable that there is an interdependence with the limit of the range of the Lazur's Tit, which keeps advancing westwards.
In the south, the blue tit populates Asia Minor and northwest Africa, including the Canary Islands, in addition to Iran. In Morocco, the range extends south to the southern foothills of the High Atlas, in Algeria to the Sahara Atlas and in Tunisia to the height of Sfax. In Libya, an isolated occurrence exists in northwestern Cyrenaica. An attempt to naturalize it in New Zealand in 1871 was unsuccessful.
Habitat
According to their wide distribution, blue tits colonize different habitats. In Central Europe, the highest settlement densities and breeding successes are achieved in oak-rich deciduous and mixed deciduous forests. The pure oak forests, which are very rare in Central Europe, are very attractive despite their small area. Much more frequent are various types of mixed oak-hornbeam forests, which also offer the species very good living conditions, as well as hardwood floodplains with a high proportion of oak. Somewhat less favourable are beech and mixed beech forests, which, however, are still quite densely populated. In mixed coniferous forests, the number of blue tit territories depends strongly on the presence of individual deciduous trees. In pure coniferous forests, the Blue Tit is absent or at best colonizes the forest edges. Both in the Alps from the montane altitudinal stage onwards and at the northern limit of its range in Scandinavia, mixed forests with a comparatively high proportion of deciduous wood are largely avoided. The settlement density, for which a maximum value of 1.85 breeding pairs per hectare was determined, is largely independent of the territory size, which lies between 0.16 and 0.84 hectares. At high settlement densities, the territories border directly on each other.
In addition to forests, the blue tit is also found in the vicinity of humans, inhabiting a variety of habitats, including those more strongly influenced by anthropogenic activity. These include semi-open cultivated landscapes with interspersed trees and hedges, orchards and parks. Probably due to competition from the great tit, population densities in settlement areas are far lower than in woodland. The blue tit needs a higher number of old trees than the great tit, but can use irregularly distributed prey more efficiently.
In general, the blue tit is a bird of the lowlands, in the mountains the occurrences are largely concentrated in the valleys. The altitudinal limit of distribution is much lower in isolated mountain ranges than in closed massifs: In the Harz Mountains the limit is 550 metres, in the Alps between 1,300 and 1,700 metres and in the Pyrenees at about 1,800 metres, in the Caucasus at 3,500 metres. A comparison of long-term observation data often shows an upward shift in the altitude limit, which is probably due to global warming and habitat changes caused by forest dieback.
In southern Europe, the habitat requirements are lower. The same applies to the low altitudes of the range in the Middle East, where blue tits can also be found in coniferous forests. The habitats of the populations in North Africa differ for the most part considerably from those of Central European representatives. They also inhabit montane coniferous forests dominated by junipers, cypresses and pines, as well as very dry habitats such as palm oases on the northern edge of the Sahara.
The Canary Islands are another special case, as the strongly preferred oaks do not occur there at all. There, the blue tit benefits from the fact that no other tit species has colonized this Atlantic archipelago. This lack of competition is evident in behavior and habitat selection; there, blue tits show a marked widening of niches. Habitats include palm groves, copses formed by tamarisk, montane forests of Canary Island pine, and the evergreen laurel forests of the island north sides. Breeding burrows are also found in the extremely arid dry scrub of southern Tenerife in the stem succulent shoots of candelabra spurge.
Outside the breeding period, habitat specificity is generally significantly reduced. When favourable food sources are available, the birds even visit treeless areas such as reed beds, pastures or exposed coastal cliffs.
Hikes
The blue tit is a resident or partial migrant within its range, with dismigration being quite pronounced, especially in young birds. Migration behaviour can change within a few generations. Also, individuals of a population often show a very different readiness to migrate.
Fidelity to the place of birth seems to be relatively low, but it is debatable whether the extremely low capture rate of young ringed birds at the place of birth is due to dismigration or high mortality. The birds dismigrate in an undirected manner, females on average move further away from the place of birth than males. A study in Brunswick found that over 90 per cent of birds settle less than three kilometres from the birthplace, further than ten kilometres from the birthplace 2.9 per cent of females and 0.7 per cent of males were encountered.
In central, eastern and northern Europe, there are individuals that remain in the breeding area for a long time, as well as those that show some of the typical characteristics of migrants; in Great Britain, however, the birds are all resident. In the other areas, weak migration is towards the south-west, beginning in late August, when the large plumage is largely moulted, and peaking about the end of September. A very weak home migration takes place between March and April. The greatest distances recorded during actual migration are around 1500 kilometres. Females participate more often in migration, moreover mainly younger and socially low birds.
Invasion-like migrations, as they regularly occur with the Coal Tit, are much rarer and less pronounced with the Blue Tit. Sometimes such migrations occur several years in a row, on the other hand almost 20 years can lie between such invasions. Mild winters with subsequent above-average breeding success are assumed to be the cause.
Furthermore, spatially more restricted vertical migrations also take place; the birds of the mountains are partly found at significantly higher altitudes in early autumn than during the breeding season. The reason for this is probably the favourable autumn food supply in this habitat. In high winter, a clear valley migration can be observed; in general, blue tits are more often found in human settlements in winter, which seem to be attractive due to artificial food sources; to what extent this is favourable for the survival of the birds is unclear.
In southern Europe, and moreover in all subspecies except the nominate form, the migratory behaviour seems to be at least partly much less pronounced.