A first approach to the topic is the linguistic use of the expression sein. In colloquial German and in Indo-European languages in general, "sein" is used grammatically as a linguistic link, as a copula, to connect subject and predicate in sentences or in statements of logic. Whether this grammatical function as a mere copula corresponds to a semantic meaninglessness of the word "being" has been controversially discussed at least since Aristotle.
"Nor is being or non-being a sign of the thing [of which it is said] that has meaning, even if 'being' were said in itself naked, for it is itself nothing at all, but denotes a certain connection [to something] in addition, which cannot be thought of without the thing connected"
Thereby, according to an observation of Aristotle, which even today many philosophers consider to be true, different meanings of the word "is" occur depending on the constellation of statements. "But since being, expressed par excellence, is used in multiple meanings." (Aristotle)
One can schematically distinguish the different meanings of the word "is" in German as follows.
- Existence. Example: Socrates is.
- Relation
- Identity
- mathematical equality. Example: Two times two is four.
- Labeling. Example: Aristotle is the teacher of Alexander.
- Definition. Example: Ontology is the study of being.
- Predication of properties. Example: Socrates is mortal.
- Classification. Example: An elephant is a mammal.
The use of "is" to denote existence can refer to the existence of objects, but also of facts (it is the case that ...). The other uses of "is", i.e. identity, predication or classification, denote relations or properties, each implicitly assuming the existence of the subject (so-called existential presupposition).